Literature DB >> 25070210

Fetal QRS detection and heart rate estimation: a wavelet-based approach.

Rute Almeida1, Hernâni Gonçalves, João Bernardes, Ana Paula Rocha.   

Abstract

Fetal heart rate monitoring is used for pregnancy surveillance in obstetric units all over the world but in spite of recent advances in analysis methods, there are still inherent technical limitations that bound its contribution to the improvement of perinatal indicators. In this work, a previously published wavelet transform based QRS detector, validated over standard electrocardiogram (ECG) databases, is adapted to fetal QRS detection over abdominal fetal ECG. Maternal ECG waves were first located using the original detector and afterwards a version with parameters adapted for fetal physiology was applied to detect fetal QRS, excluding signal singularities associated with maternal heartbeats. Single lead (SL) based marks were combined in a single annotator with post processing rules (SLR) from which fetal RR and fetal heart rate (FHR) measures can be computed. Data from PhysioNet with reference fetal QRS locations was considered for validation, with SLR outperforming SL including ICA based detections. The error in estimated FHR using SLR was lower than 20 bpm for more than 80% of the processed files. The median error in 1 min based FHR estimation was 0.13 bpm, with a correlation between reference and estimated FHR of 0.48, which increased to 0.73 when considering only records for which estimated FHR > 110 bpm. This allows us to conclude that the proposed methodology is able to provide a clinically useful estimation of the FHR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25070210     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  8 in total

1.  Compression and Encryption of ECG Signal Using Wavelet and Chaotically Huffman Code in Telemedicine Application.

Authors:  Mahsa Raeiatibanadkooki; Saeed Rahati Quchani; MohammadMahdi KhalilZade; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Non-invasive fetal ECG analysis.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Joachim Behar; George B Moody
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Real Time Processing and Transferring ECG Signal by a Mobile Phone.

Authors:  Mahsa Raeiatibanadkooki; Saeed Rahati Quachani; Mohammadmahdi Khalilzade; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-12-19

4.  Fusion of detected multi-channel maternal electrocardiogram (ECG) R-wave peak locations.

Authors:  Qiong Yu; Qun Guan; Ping Li; Tie-Bing Liu; Xiao-Lin Huang; Ying Zhao; Hong-Xing Liu; Yuan-Qing Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation?

Authors:  Janusz Jezewski; Janusz Wrobel; Adam Matonia; Krzysztof Horoba; Radek Martinek; Tomasz Kupka; Michal Jezewski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Fetal electrocardiograms, direct and abdominal with reference heartbeat annotations.

Authors:  Adam Matonia; Janusz Jezewski; Tomasz Kupka; Michał Jezewski; Krzysztof Horoba; Janusz Wrobel; Robert Czabanski; Radana Kahankowa
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Invariant heart beat span versus variant heart beat intervals and its application to fetal ECG extraction.

Authors:  Huawen Yan; Hongxing Liu; Xiaolin Huang; Ying Zhao; Junfeng Si; Tiebing Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  A clustering-based method for single-channel fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  Encarnación Castillo; Diego P Morales; Antonio García; Luis Parrilla; Víctor U Ruiz; José A Álvarez-Bermejo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.