Literature DB >> 25069873

Effects of stimulation frequency and intensity in sacral neuromodulation on anorectal inputs to the somatosensory cortex in an experimental model.

J Evers1, L Devane, E V Carrington, S M Scott, C H Knowles, P R O'Connell, J F X Jones.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence, stimulation parameters have been derived empirically and only one frequency (14 Hz) is employed clinically. The aim of this study was to test a range of stimulation frequencies to establish an optimal frequency of SNM for maximum augmentation of anal canal cortical evoked potentials (EPs) in an animal model.
METHODS: In female Wistar rats, anal canal EPs were recorded over the primary somatosensory cortex using a flexible multielectrode array, and the effect of SNM was studied. SNM was applied at 0·1-100 Hz and a frequency response curve plotted. The data were fitted to a quadratic equation.
RESULTS: The magnitude of potentiation of anal canal EPs caused by SNM depended significantly on stimulation frequency (P < 0·001). The frequency-potentiation relationship was parabolic in form, with a clear optimum at 2 Hz. The SNM must be applied for at least 3 min. The theoretical maximal potentiation predicted by the model was not found to be statistically different to actual data recorded (P = 0·514-0·814). The response depended on stimulation amplitude in an 'all-or-nothing' fashion. EPs were augmented when the SNM intensity was 0·5 times the motor threshold to tail twitch or greater, but values below this intensity failed to affect the EPs.
CONCLUSION: The effect of SNM in this animal model is governed principally by frequency, with an optimum of 2 Hz. If animal data can be translated to humans, optimization of SNM frequency may offer a clinically relevant improvement in the efficacy of SNM. Surgical relevance Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for faecal incontinence currently employs stimulation parameters that have been derived empirically and may not be optimal. This study used an animal model of SNM and focused on its acute effect on anal canal cortical evoked potentials (EPs). It was found that SNM potentiated EPs, with a clear optimum at a frequency of 2 Hz. If this finding is applicable to the mechanism of action of human SNM, this suggests that there may be a clinically relevant improvement by reducing stimulus frequency from its typical value of 14 Hz to 2 Hz.
© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25069873     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

Review 1.  An animal model of faecal incontinence and sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  James F X Jones
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation with appropriate parameters improves constipation in rats by enhancing colon motility mediated via the autonomic-cholinergic mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhihui Huang; Shiying Li; Robert D Foreman; Jieyun Yin; Ning Dai; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults.

Authors:  Mohamed A Thaha; Amin A Abukar; Noel N Thin; Anthony Ramsanahie; Charles H Knowles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-24

4.  Neuronal Activation in the Periaqueductal Gray Matter Upon Electrical Stimulation of the Bladder.

Authors:  Céline Meriaux; Ramona Hohnen; Sandra Schipper; Aryo Zare; Ali Jahanshahi; Lori A Birder; Yasin Temel; Gommert A van Koeveringe
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Case Report: Sacral Nerve Root Pelvic Neural Retraining, With Long-Term Sustainability After the Device Explantation.

Authors:  Panteleimon Vassiliu; Filippos Patoulis; Leon Naar; Georgios Dendias; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-07-27

6.  Effects of Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy on Gut and Brain Interactions and Anorectal Neuropathy in Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Yun Yan; Xuelian Xiang; Amol Sharma; Deepak Ayyala; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 7.  Sacral Neuromodulation for Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Dysfunction in Animal Models: A Systematic Review With Focus on Stimulation Parameter Selection.

Authors:  Perla Douven; Roman Assmann; Stephanie O Breukink; Jarno Melenhorst; Jos Kleijnen; Elbert A Joosten; Gommert A van Koeveringe
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-08-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.