Literature DB >> 25069769

Extracting fetal heart beats from maternal abdominal recordings: selection of the optimal principal components.

Costanzo Di Maria1, Chengyu Liu, Dingchang Zheng, Alan Murray, Philip Langley.   

Abstract

This study presents a systematic comparison of different approaches to the automated selection of the principal components (PC) which optimise the detection of maternal and fetal heart beats from non-invasive maternal abdominal recordings.A public database of 75 4-channel non-invasive maternal abdominal recordings was used for training the algorithm. Four methods were developed and assessed to determine the optimal PC: (1) power spectral distribution, (2) root mean square, (3) sample entropy, and (4) QRS template. The sensitivity of the performance of the algorithm to large-amplitude noise removal (by wavelet de-noising) and maternal beat cancellation methods were also assessed. The accuracy of maternal and fetal beat detection was assessed against reference annotations and quantified using the detection accuracy score F1 [2*PPV*Se / (PPV + Se)], sensitivity (Se), and positive predictive value (PPV). The best performing implementation was assessed on a test dataset of 100 recordings and the agreement between the computed and the reference fetal heart rate (fHR) and fetal RR (fRR) time series quantified.The best performance for detecting maternal beats (F1 99.3%, Se 99.0%, PPV 99.7%) was obtained when using the QRS template method to select the optimal maternal PC and applying wavelet de-noising. The best performance for detecting fetal beats (F1 89.8%, Se 89.3%, PPV 90.5%) was obtained when the optimal fetal PC was selected using the sample entropy method and utilising a fixed-length time window for the cancellation of the maternal beats. The performance on the test dataset was 142.7 beats(2)/min(2) for fHR and 19.9 ms for fRR, ranking respectively 14 and 17 (out of 29) when compared to the other algorithms presented at the Physionet Challenge 2013.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25069769     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  6 in total

1.  An adaptive integrated algorithm for noninvasive fetal ECG separation and noise reduction based on ICA-EEMD-WS.

Authors:  Guangchen Liu; Yihui Luan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Efficient Fetal-Maternal ECG Signal Separation from Two Channel Maternal Abdominal ECG via Diffusion-Based Channel Selection.

Authors:  Ruilin Li; Martin G Frasch; Hau-Tieng Wu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Non-invasive fetal ECG analysis.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Joachim Behar; George B Moody
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Non-Invasive Fetal Monitoring: A Maternal Surface ECG Electrode Placement-Based Novel Approach for Optimization of Adaptive Filter Control Parameters Using the LMS and RLS Algorithms.

Authors:  Radek Martinek; Radana Kahankova; Homer Nazeran; Jaromir Konecny; Janusz Jezewski; Petr Janku; Petr Bilik; Jan Zidek; Jan Nedoma; Marcel Fajkus
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Non-linear Methods Predominant in Fetal Heart Rate Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Ribeiro; João Monteiro-Santos; Luísa Castro; Luís Antunes; Cristina Costa-Santos; Andreia Teixeira; Teresa S Henriques
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-30

6.  Wearable Fetal ECG Monitoring System from Abdominal Electrocardiography Recording.

Authors:  Yuwei Zhang; Aihua Gu; Zhijun Xiao; Yantao Xing; Chenxi Yang; Jianqing Li; Chengyu Liu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.