BACKGROUND: The school-age versions of the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment) incorporate the DSM-Oriented scales. These scales make it possible to quantify and normalize problems defined in the DSM. The objective was to study the incremental validity of the DSM-Oriented scales of the ASEBA inventories, the Child Behavior Checklist - CBCL, completed by parents of children aged 6-18 years, and the Youth Self-Report -YSR, a self-report for children/adolescents aged 11-18, over: (a) scores on the Syndromes Scales for making DSM-IV diagnoses; and (b) diagnoses obtained with structured interviews for the assessment of functioning. METHOD: A clinical sample of 420 children and adolescents (8-17 years) was assessed with the CBCL, and 108 adolescents were assessed with the CBCL and YSR questionnaires. All underwent a diagnostic interview, and interviewers completed a measure of global functional impairment. RESULTS: The DSM-Oriented scales showed significant incremental validity in conjunction with the Empirical Syndrome scales for discriminating DSM-IV diagnoses, and considerable incremental validity in conjunction with the diagnoses obtained through the diagnostic interview for predicting the level of functional impairment. CONCLUSION: DSM-Oriented scales should be considered simultaneously with the Syndrome Scales of the ASEBA taxonomy, as they provide useful additional information in the clinical process.
BACKGROUND: The school-age versions of the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment) incorporate the DSM-Oriented scales. These scales make it possible to quantify and normalize problems defined in the DSM. The objective was to study the incremental validity of the DSM-Oriented scales of the ASEBA inventories, the Child Behavior Checklist - CBCL, completed by parents of children aged 6-18 years, and the Youth Self-Report -YSR, a self-report for children/adolescents aged 11-18, over: (a) scores on the Syndromes Scales for making DSM-IV diagnoses; and (b) diagnoses obtained with structured interviews for the assessment of functioning. METHOD: A clinical sample of 420 children and adolescents (8-17 years) was assessed with the CBCL, and 108 adolescents were assessed with the CBCL and YSR questionnaires. All underwent a diagnostic interview, and interviewers completed a measure of global functional impairment. RESULTS: The DSM-Oriented scales showed significant incremental validity in conjunction with the Empirical Syndrome scales for discriminating DSM-IV diagnoses, and considerable incremental validity in conjunction with the diagnoses obtained through the diagnostic interview for predicting the level of functional impairment. CONCLUSION: DSM-Oriented scales should be considered simultaneously with the Syndrome Scales of the ASEBA taxonomy, as they provide useful additional information in the clinical process.
Authors: Cindy Pham; Regan Vryer; Martin O'Hely; Toby Mansell; David Burgner; Fiona Collier; Christos Symeonides; Mimi L K Tang; Peter Vuillermin; Lawrence Gray; Richard Saffery; Anne-Louise Ponsonby Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Rodrigo B Mansur; Graccielle R Cunha; Elson Asevedo; André Zugman; Maiara Zeni-Graiff; Adiel C Rios; Sumit Sethi; Pawan K Maurya; Mateus L Levandowski; Ary Gadelha; Pedro M Pan; Laura Stertz; Síntia I Belangero; Márcia Kauer-Sant' Anna; Antônio L Teixeira; Jair J Mari; Luis A Rohde; Euripedes C Miguel; Roger S McIntyre; Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira; Rodrigo A Bressan; Elisa Brietzke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura W Wesseldijk; Iryna O Fedko; Meike Bartels; Michel G Nivard; Catharina E M van Beijsterveldt; Dorret I Boomsma; Christel M Middeldorp Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 3.568