Literature DB >> 25068706

Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.

Marilena Muntean1, Greet Janssens-Maenhout2, Shaojie Song3, Noelle E Selin3, Jos G J Olivier4, Diego Guizzardi2, Rob Maas5, Frank Dentener2.   

Abstract

The Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) provides a time-series of man-made emissions of greenhouse gases and short-lived atmospheric pollutants from 1970 to 2008. Mercury is included in EDGARv4.tox1, thereby enriching the spectrum of multi-pollutant sources in the database. With an average annual growth rate of 1.3% since 1970, EDGARv4 estimates that the global mercury emissions reached 1,287 tonnes in 2008. Specifically, gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) (Hg(0)) accounted for 72% of the global total emissions, while gaseous oxidised mercury (GOM) (Hg(2+)) and particle bound mercury (PBM) (Hg-P) accounted for only 22% and 6%, respectively. The less reactive form, i.e., Hg(0), has a long atmospheric residence time and can be transported long distances from the emission sources. The artisanal and small-scale gold production, accounted for approximately half of the global Hg(0) emissions in 2008 followed by combustion (29%), cement production (12%) and other metal industry (10%). Given the local-scale impacts of mercury, special attention was given to the spatial distribution showing the emission hot-spots on gridded 0.1°×0.1° resolution maps using detailed proxy data. The comprehensive ex-post analysis of the mitigation of mercury emissions by end-of-pipe abatement measures in the power generation sector and technology changes in the chlor-alkali industry over four decades indicates reductions of 46% and 93%, respectively. Combined, the improved technologies and mitigation measures in these sectors accounted for 401.7 tonnes of avoided mercury emissions in 2008. A comparison shows that EDGARv4 anthropogenic emissions are nearly equivalent to the lower estimates of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)'s mercury emissions inventory for 2005 for most sectors. An evaluation of the EDGARv4 global mercury emission inventory, including mercury speciation, was performed using the GEOS-Chem global 3-D mercury model. The model can generally reproduce both spatial variations and long-term trends in total gaseous mercury concentrations and wet deposition fluxes.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artisanal and small-scale gold production; Atmospheric modelling; End-of-pipe impacts; Global gridmaps; Inventory evaluation; Mercury emissions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068706     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Monsoon-driven transport of atmospheric mercury to the South China Sea from the Chinese mainland and Southeast Asia-Observation of gaseous elemental mercury at a background station in South China.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Laiguo Chen; Donghai Xie; Jiaren Sun; Qiusheng He; Limei Cai; Zhiqiang Gao; Yiqiang Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Daniel J Jacob; Hannah M Horowitz; Long Chen; Helen M Amos; David P Krabbenhoft; Franz Slemr; Vincent L St Louis; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metal contamination of river otters in North Carolina.

Authors:  Charles W Sanders; Krishna Pacifici; George R Hess; Colleen Olfenbuttel; Christopher S DePerno
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Global health impact of atmospheric mercury emissions from artisanal and small-scale gold mining.

Authors:  Qiaotong Pang; Jing Gu; Haikun Wang; Yanxu Zhang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  A high spatial resolution dataset for anthropogenic atmospheric mercury emissions in China during 1998-2014.

Authors:  Weicen Chang; Qiumeng Zhong; Sai Liang; Jianchuan Qi
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 8.501

Review 7.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Particulate-phase mercury emissions from biomass burning and impact on resulting deposition: a modelling assessment.

Authors:  Francesco De Simone; Paulo Artaxo; Mariantonia Bencardino; Sergio Cinnirella; Francesco Carbone; Francesco D'Amore; Aurélien Dommergue; Xin Bin Feng; Christian N Gencarelli; Ian M Hedgecock; Matthew S Landis; Francesca Sprovieri; Noriuki Suzuki; Ingvar Wängberg; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

9.  Seasonal Evolution of Size-Segregated Particulate Mercury in the Atmospheric Aerosol Over Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica.

Authors:  Silvia Illuminati; Anna Annibaldi; Sébastien Bau; Claudio Scarchilli; Virginia Ciardini; Paolo Grigioni; Federico Girolametti; Flavio Vagnoni; Giuseppe Scarponi; Cristina Truzzi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  A new approach to evaluate regional inequity determined by PM2.5 emissions and concentrations.

Authors:  Xiaowei Chuai; Yue Lu; Fangjian Xie; Feng Yang; Rongqin Zhao; Baoxin Pang
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 6.789

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.