Zhongqin Chen1, Hanyu Shao2, Mingwei Xu1, Guoping Peng1, Ping Liu1, Xiaoyan Liu1, Chunlei Shan3, Xuchu Weng2, Benyan Luo1. 1. Department of Neurology and Brain Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. 2. Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Hangzhou Normal University. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Currently, it is unclear whether a radical-by-radical (RBR) reading strategy exists in Chinese pure alexia, compared to the letter-by-letter (LBL) reading strategy in alphabetic languages. In this study, we focus on exploring the reading features of a Chinese pure alexic patient during the process of language recovery. METHOD: We investigated this issue using a series of neuropsychological tests at 4 days, 11 days, and 8 months after admission of a Chinese pure alexic patient. RESULTS: The results showed that most words could not be read aloud initially by the patient. One week later, 2 clinical features were noted: RBR reading strategy and integration impairment. Finally, there were statistically significant differences in the reaction time between the single characters and compound characters, which indicated that a radical number effect may exist. CONCLUSION: Combined with the results of previous studies, the current case study indicates that there is evidence suggesting that the RBR reading strategy in Chinese pure alexia is of limited benefit, a result that appears fundamentally different from the LBL reading strategy. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Currently, it is unclear whether a radical-by-radical (RBR) reading strategy exists in Chinese pure alexia, compared to the letter-by-letter (LBL) reading strategy in alphabetic languages. In this study, we focus on exploring the reading features of a Chinese pure alexic patient during the process of language recovery. METHOD: We investigated this issue using a series of neuropsychological tests at 4 days, 11 days, and 8 months after admission of a Chinese pure alexic patient. RESULTS: The results showed that most words could not be read aloud initially by the patient. One week later, 2 clinical features were noted: RBR reading strategy and integration impairment. Finally, there were statistically significant differences in the reaction time between the single characters and compound characters, which indicated that a radical number effect may exist. CONCLUSION: Combined with the results of previous studies, the current case study indicates that there is evidence suggesting that the RBR reading strategy in Chinese pure alexia is of limited benefit, a result that appears fundamentally different from the LBL reading strategy. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).