Literature DB >> 25068669

Functional neuroimaging of the Iowa Gambling Task in older adults.

Kameko Halfmann1, William Hedgcock2, Antoine Bechara3, Natalie L Denburg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The neural systems most susceptible to age-related decline mirror the systems linked to decision making. Yet, the neural processes underlying decision-making disparities among older adults are not well understood. We sought to identify neural response patterns that distinguish 2 groups of older adults who exhibit divergent decision-making patterns.
METHOD: Participants were 31 healthy older adults (ages 59-88, 53% female), defined as advantageous or disadvantageous decision-makers based on Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) performance, who completed an alternate version of the IGT while undergoing functional MRI. The groups were indistinguishable on neuropsychological testing. We contrasted the BOLD signal between groups during 3 phases of the decision-making process: Prechoice (preselection), Prefeedback (postselection), and Feedback (receipt of gains/losses). We further examined whether BOLD signal varied as a function of age in each group.
RESULTS: We observed greater activation among the IGT-Disadvantageous relative to -Advantageous older adults in the prefrontal cortex during the early phases of the decision-making process (Prechoice), and in posterior brain regions (e.g., the precuneus) during the later phases (Prefeedback and Feedback). We also found that with increasing age, IGT-Advantageous older adults showed increasing activation in the prefrontal cortex during all phases and increasing activation in the posterior cingulate during earlier phases of the decision process. By contrast, the IGT-Disadvantageous older adults exhibited a reduced or reversed trend.
CONCLUSIONS: These functional differences may be a consequence of altered reward processing or differing compensatory strategies between IGT-Disadvantageous and -Advantageous older adults. This supports the notion that divergent neurobiological aging trajectories underlie disparate decision-making patterns. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068669     DOI: 10.1037/neu0000120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  6 in total

1.  Individual differences in the neural signature of subjective value among older adults.

Authors:  Kameko Halfmann; William Hedgcock; Joseph Kable; Natalie L Denburg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Cognitive control, reward-related decision making and outcomes of late-life depression treated with an antidepressant.

Authors:  G S Alexopoulos; K Manning; D Kanellopoulos; A McGovern; J K Seirup; S Banerjee; F Gunning
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Altered Value Coding in the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Loreen Mamerow; Xu Lei; Lei Fang; Rui Mata
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 4.  Decision Making under Ambiguity and Objective Risk in Higher Age - A Review on Cognitive and Emotional Contributions.

Authors:  Magnus Liebherr; Johannes Schiebener; Heike Averbeck; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-06

5.  Added value of functional neuroimaging to assess decision-making capacity of older adults with neurocognitive disorders: protocol for a prospective, monocentric, single-arm study (IMAGISION).

Authors:  Thomas Tannou; Aurelie Godard-Marceau; Sven Joubert; Serge Daneault; Marie-Jeanne Kergoat; Eloi Magnin; Alexandre Comte; Damien Gabriel; Chrystelle Vidal; Lionel Pazart; Regis Aubry
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Role of Emotional vs. Cognitive Intelligence in Economic Decision-Making Amongst Older Adults.

Authors:  Kanchna Ramchandran; Daniel Tranel; Keagan Duster; Natalie L Denburg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.