Literature DB >> 25068661

Detection of somatic mutations in tumors using unaligned clonal sequencing data.

Kate M Sutton1, Laura A Crinnion2, David Wallace2, Sally Harrison3, Paul Roberts2, Christopher M Watson2, Alexander F Markham3, David T Bonthron3, Philip Quirke1, Ian M Carr3.   

Abstract

Most cancers arise and evolve as a consequence of somatic mutations. These mutations influence tumor behavior and clinical outcome. Consequently, there is considerable interest in identifying somatic variants within specific genes (such as BRAF, KRAS and EGFR) so that chemotherapy can be tailored to the patient's tumor genotype rather than using a generic treatment based on histological diagnosis alone. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of tumors, a somatic mutation may be present in only a subset of cells, necessitating the use of quantitative techniques to detect rare variants. The highly quantitative nature of next-generation sequencing (NGS), together with the ability to multiplex numerous samples, makes NGS an attractive choice with which to screen for somatic variants. However, the large volumes of sequence data present significant difficulties when applying NGS for the detection of somatic mutations. To alleviate this, we have developed methodologies including a set of data analysis programs, which allow the rapid screening of multiple formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples for the presence of specified somatic variants using unaligned Illumina NGS data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068661     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  27 in total

Review 1.  Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Mythily Srinivasan; Daniel Sedmak; Scott Jewell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Lira Mamanova; Alison J Coffey; Carol E Scott; Iwanka Kozarewa; Emily H Turner; Akash Kumar; Eleanor Howard; Jay Shendure; Daniel J Turner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Mutant p53: one name, many proteins.

Authors:  William A Freed-Pastor; Carol Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A statistical method for the detection of variants from next-generation resequencing of DNA pools.

Authors:  Vikas Bansal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Mutation detection by clonal sequencing of PCR amplicons and grouped read typing is applicable to clinical diagnostics.

Authors:  Philip A Chambers; Lucy F Stead; Joanne E Morgan; Ian M Carr; Kate M Sutton; Christopher M Watson; Victoria Crowe; Helen Dickinson; Paul Roberts; Clive Mulatero; Matthew Seymour; Alexander F Markham; Paul M Waring; Philip Quirke; Graham R Taylor
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  MetaID: a novel method for identification and quantification of metagenomic samples.

Authors:  Satish M Srinivasan; Chittibabu Guda
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A comprehensive metatranscriptome analysis pipeline and its validation using human small intestine microbiota datasets.

Authors:  Milkha M Leimena; Javier Ramiro-Garcia; Mark Davids; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Hauke Smidt; Eddy J Smid; Jos Boekhorst; Erwin G Zoetendal; Peter J Schaap; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinctive features of single nucleotide alterations in induced pluripotent stem cells with different types of DNA repair deficiency disorders.

Authors:  Kohji Okamura; Hironari Sakaguchi; Rie Sakamoto-Abutani; Mahito Nakanishi; Ken Nishimura; Mayu Yamazaki-Inoue; Manami Ohtaka; Vaiyapuri Subbarayan Periasamy; Ali Abdullah Alshatwi; Akon Higuchi; Kazunori Hanaoka; Kazuhiko Nakabayashi; Shuji Takada; Kenichiro Hata; Masashi Toyoda; Akihiro Umezawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.