Literature DB >> 25068630

Murine embryonic fibroblast cell lines differentiate into three mesenchymal lineages to different extents: new models to investigate differentiation processes.

Khaled Dastagir1, Kerstin Reimers, Andrea Lazaridis, Sabrina Jahn, Viktor Maurer, Sarah Strauß, Nadjib Dastagir, Christine Radtke, Andreas Kampmann, Vesna Bucan, Peter M Vogt.   

Abstract

Various diseases, injuries, and congenital abnormalities may result in degeneration and loss of organs and tissues. Recently, tissue engineering has offered new treatment options for these common, severe, and costly problems in human health care. Its application is often based on the usage of differentiated stem cells. However, despite intensive research and growing knowledge, many questions remain unresolved in the process of cell differentiation. The aim of this study was to find standardized cell models for analyzing molecular mechanisms of cell differentiation. We investigated the multipotency of three standardized murine embryonic fibroblast cell cultures using histological staining, western blotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Our results demonstrated that NIH-3T3 and mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells were able to differentiate into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages expressing typical differentiation markers. Interestingly, Flp-In-3T3 cells did not differentiate into any of the three mesenchymal lineages, although this cell line is genetically closely related to NIH-3T3. The results were confirmed by histological staining. Flp-In-3T3, NIH-3T3, and MEF cells have usually been used for DNA transfections, recombinant protein expression, and as "feeder cells." Unlike mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), they are easy to obtain and to expand and are less prone to change their structure and morphology, even at higher passages. Our results suggest that Flp-In-3T3, MEF, and NIH-3T3 cells are highly suitable to be used as models to analyze molecular mechanisms of cell differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068630      PMCID: PMC4115680          DOI: 10.1089/cell.2014.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  43 in total

1.  Prospects for organ and tissue replacement.

Authors:  L E Niklason; R Langer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  H Kalervo Väänänen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Milieu-adopted in vitro and in vivo differentiation of mesenchymal tissues derived from different adult human CD34-negative progenitor cell clones.

Authors:  Sabine Moosmann; Jörg Hutter; Christian Moser; Fritz Krombach; Ralf Huss
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.481

4.  Consequences of seeded cell type on vascularization of tissue engineering constructs in vivo.

Authors:  Paul Schumann; Frank Tavassol; Daniel Lindhorst; Constantin Stuehmer; Kai-Hendrik Bormann; Andreas Kampmann; Rolf Mülhaupt; Matthias W Laschke; Michael D Menger; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Martin Rücker
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.514

5.  Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells.

Authors:  Patricia A Zuk; Min Zhu; Peter Ashjian; Daniel A De Ugarte; Jerry I Huang; Hiroshi Mizuno; Zeni C Alfonso; John K Fraser; Prosper Benhaim; Marc H Hedrick
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Absence of p53 allows direct immortalization of hematopoietic cells by the myc and raf oncogenes.

Authors:  T Metz; A W Harris; J M Adams
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-07-14       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Phenotypic changes of adult porcine mesenchymal stem cells induced by prolonged passaging in culture.

Authors:  Victor Vacanti; Elton Kong; Gen Suzuki; Kazuki Sato; John M Canty; Techung Lee
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  The chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells.

Authors:  J U Yoo; T S Barthel; K Nishimura; L Solchaga; A I Caplan; V M Goldberg; B Johnstone
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) in bone engineering: limitations and recent advances.

Authors:  Anna R Derubeis; Ranieri Cancedda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  p53 plays a role in mesenchymal differentiation programs, in a cell fate dependent manner.

Authors:  Alina Molchadsky; Igor Shats; Naomi Goldfinger; Meirav Pevsner-Fischer; Melissa Olson; Ariel Rinon; Eldad Tzahor; Guillermina Lozano; Dov Zipori; Rachel Sarig; Varda Rotter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Studying Metabolic Abnormalities in the Costello Syndrome HRAS G12V Mouse Model: Isolation of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts and Their In Vitro Adipocyte Differentiation.

Authors:  Miray Fidan; Saravanakkumar Chennappan; Ion Cristian Cirstea
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Adipogenic Potential: A Comprehensive Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Al-Sayegh; Hamad Ali; Mohammad H Jamal; Mei ElGindi; Tina Chanyong; Khulood Al-Awadi; Mohamed Abu-Farha
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Induction of ubiquitin C (UBC) gene transcription is mediated by HSF1: role of proteotoxic and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Marzia Bianchi; Rita Crinelli; Vanessa Arbore; Mauro Magnani
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.693

4.  In vitro estimation of metal-induced disturbance in chicken gut-oviduct chemokine circuit.

Authors:  Ki Hyung Kim; Juil Kim; Jae Yong Han; Yuseok Moon
Journal:  Mol Cell Toxicol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 1.080

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.