Literature DB >> 25068375

Treatment patterns among older patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States: a retrospective cohort study.

Haoda Fu1, Bradley H Curtis, Dara P Schuster, Andreas Festa, David M Kendall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association consensus statement on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in older patients highlights the need for treatment pattern and effectiveness data from real-world settings and populations. This retrospective cohort study assessed the relative frequency of use of four commonly prescribed antihyperglycemia treatments for T2DM and quantified their effectiveness up to 2 years post-initiation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Within a large, U.S.-based, electronic health record database, we investigated usage of insulin, sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with T2DM, focusing on those ≥65 years old, although younger patients were included for comparative purposes.
RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 77,440 patients. Mean baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels for patients ≥65 years old varied among treatments: insulin (7.7% [61 mmol/mol]; n=3,311), sulfonylureas (7.0% [53 mmol/mol]; n=5,706), GLP-1 receptor agonists (7.1% [54 mmol/mol]; n=260), and DPP-4 inhibitors (7.1% [54 mmol/mol]; n=1,096). Older patients demonstrated good glycemic control at therapy initiation and were prescribed glucose-lowering agents at lower HbA1c values compared with younger patients. A large proportion of older patients were prescribed sulfonylureas (56%) and insulin (34%) compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists (3.4%) and DPP-4 inhibitors (12%), despite the associated risk of hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating insulin and sulfonylureas demonstrated more sustained glycemic control compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors. A majority of older patients with T2DM was initiated on sulfonylureas and insulin at relatively low levels of HbA1c, a practice not entirely consistent with the recommendations of published guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068375     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  4 in total

1.  Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Therapeutic Management of Adults over 65 Years Old with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain.

Authors:  F Formiga; J Franch-Nadal; L Rodriguez; L Ávila; E Fuster
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Glycaemic outcomes of an Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER vulnerable patIents: A randomized, controlled stUdy in type 2 diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM).

Authors:  Simon R Heller; Richard E Pratley; Alan Sinclair; Andreas Festa; Jacek Kiljański; Cynthia S Brusko; Ran Duan; Robert J Heine
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Reduced Glucose Variability With Glucose-Dependent Versus Glucose-Independent Therapies Despite Similar Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia Rates in a Randomized, Controlled Study of Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Richard E Pratley; Julio Rosenstock; Simon R Heller; Alan Sinclair; Robert J Heine; Jacek Kiljański; Cynthia S Brusko; Ran Duan; Andreas Festa
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-12

4.  Cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics for the PIONEER 6 trial.

Authors:  Stephen C Bain; Ofri Mosenzon; Rosario Arechavaleta; Pawel Bogdański; Abdurrahman Comlekci; Agostino Consoli; Chaicharn Deerochanawong; Kathleen Dungan; Maria C Faingold; Michael E Farkouh; Denise R Franco; Jeppe Gram; Cristian Guja; Pankaj Joshi; Rachid Malek; Juan F Merino-Torres; Michael A Nauck; Sue D Pedersen; Wayne H-H Sheu; Robert J Silver; Cees J Tack; Nikhil Tandon; Ole K Jeppesen; Mette Strange; Mette Thomsen; Mansoor Husain
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 6.577

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.