Michele C Jen1, María C Serrano2, Robert van Lith1, Guillermo A Ameer1. 1. Biomedical Engineering Department, Northwestern University, Evanston IL, 60208, USA. 2. Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Abstract
Since the discovery of nitric oxide (NO) in the 1980s, this cellular messenger has been shown to participate in diverse biological processes such as cardiovascular homeostasis, immune response, wound healing, bone metabolism, and neurotransmission. Its beneficial effects have prompted increased research in the past two decades, with a focus on the development of materials that can locally release NO. However, significant limitations arise when applying these materials to biomedical applications. This Feature Article focuses on the development of NO-releasing and NO-generating polymeric materials (2006-2011) with emphasis on recent in vivo applications. Results are compared and discussed in terms of NO dose, release kinetics, and biological effects, in order to provide a foundation to design and evaluate new NO therapies.
Since the discovery of nclass="Chemical">nitric oxide (NO) in the 1980s, this cellular messenger has been shown to class="Chemical">particiclass="Chemical">pate in diverse biological processes such as class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">cardiovascular homeostasis, immune response, wound healing, bone metabolism, and neurotransmission. Its beneficial effects have prompted increased research in the past two decades, with a focus on the development of materials that can locally release NO. However, significant limitations arise when applying these materials to biomedical applications. This Feature Article focuses on the development of NO-releasing and NO-generating polymeric materials (2006-2011) with emphasis on recent in vivo applications. Results are compared and discussed in terms of NO dose, release kinetics, and biological effects, in order to provide a foundation to design and evaluate new NO therapies.
Authors: Melissa M Reynolds; Joseph E Saavedra; Brett M Showalter; Carlos A Valdez; Anna P Shanklin; Bong K Oh; Larry K Keefer; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: J Mater Chem Date: 2010-01-01
Authors: Charles G Pearce; Samer F Najjar; Muneera R Kapadia; Jozef Murar; Jason Eng; Brian Lyle; Oliver O Aalami; Qun Jiang; Joseph A Hrabie; Joseph E Saavedra; Larry K Keefer; Melina R Kibbe Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2007-09-25 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Melissa M Batchelor; Sylvie L Reoma; Paul S Fleser; Vijay K Nuthakki; Rose E Callahan; Charles J Shanley; Jeffrey K Politis; Jessica Elmore; Scott I Merz; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-11-20 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Elizabeth J Brisbois; Jill Bayliss; Jianfeng Wu; Terry C Major; Chuanwu Xi; Stewart C Wang; Robert H Bartlett; Hitesh Handa; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Elizabeth J Brisbois; Ryan P Davis; Anna M Jones; Terry C Major; Robert H Bartlett; Mark E Meyerhoff; Hitesh Handa Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 6.331
Authors: Xuewei Wang; Aaron Jolliffe; Benjamin Carr; Qi Zhang; Mark Bilger; Yu Cui; Jianfeng Wu; Xianglong Wang; Mollie Mahoney; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Justin Douglas; Robert H Bartlett; Chuanwu Xi; Joseph L Bull; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 6.843
Authors: Ahyeon Koh; Alexis W Carpenter; Danielle L Slomberg; Mark H Schoenfisch Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 9.229