Literature DB >> 25067811

Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: A nationwide study.

Ming-Ping Wu1,2, Cheng-Yu Long3, Ching-Chung Liang4, Shih-Feng Weng5,6, Yat-Ching Tong7.   

Abstract

AIMS: Using the National Health Insurance (NHI) database in Taiwan, the study aimed to evaluate the rates and associated factors for reoperation of female stress incontinence.
METHODS: Records of female patients who had received a primary surgical treatment for stress incontinence from January 2000 to December 2006 were retrieved. Among these, patients who had reoperations during follow-up till December 2010 were identified. The data were analyzed for reoperation rates, surgery methods, patient demography, surgeon, and hospital attributes.
RESULTS: Among 14,613 patients with a mean follow-up of 86.28 ± 26.76 months, 563 (3.85%) had reoperations, an incidence rate of 54.37 per 10,000 person year (PY). Injection procedures had the highest reoperation rate of 893.30/10,000 PY. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of reoperation was higher for mid-urethral sling when compared to pubovaginal sling (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.05) or retropubic urethropexy including Burch operation (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.61). Surgeons with high service volumes tended to have fewer reoperations. No correlations were noted between the reoperation rate with patient age, surgeon age/gender, year of operation and hospital status. However, urologists had higher reoperation rates than gynecologists. For repeat surgery, the majority of patients chose the same specialty but different surgical types. Mid-urethral sling was used most commonly in 48.85% of reoperations.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial number of patients need reoperation for stress incontinence. The choice of primary surgery type and surgeon specialty may affect the reoperation rates. Mid-urethral sling is the most common reoperation choice.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mid-urethral sling; reoperation; surgery; urine incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25067811     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  4 in total

1.  Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Alexis A Dieter; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Repeat surgery after failed midurethral slings: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Margrethe Foss Hansen; Gunnar Lose; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Kim Oren Gradel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Concurrent midurethral sling excision or lysis at the time of repeat sling for treatment of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sarah E Steele; Audra J Hill; Cecile A Unger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Two-year outcomes of surgeon-tailored trans obturator tape for female stress urinary incontinence: a randomized, comparative, trial with traditional trans obturator tape.

Authors:  Salah E Shebl
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.