Literature DB >> 25066920

Long term safety of sacral nerve modulation in medicare beneficiaries.

Bilal Chughtai1, Art Sedrakyan2, Abby Isaacs2, Richard Lee1, Alexis Te1, Steven Kaplan1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is FDA approved as second-line therapy for both urinary and bowel control. However, there is limited evidence regarding long term safety. We determined adverse events associated with SNS among Medicare beneficiaries.
METHODS: We used the 5% national random sample of Medicare claims for 2001-2011 to identify patients. Patients who underwent SNS implantation were identified with Current Procedure Terminology (CPT-4) codes. We determined safety of SNS using analysis of complication occurrences on day of surgery and during 5 years following initial procedure. SAS v9.3 statistical package was used.
RESULTS: One thousand four hundred seventy-four patients underwent treatment with SNS in the 5% national sample of Medicare patients within the time period. Representative of real-world patients undergoing SNS surgery, comorbidities included hypertension (69.3%), diabetes (29.4%), chronic pulmonary disease (25.5%), hypothyroidism (25.2%), and depression (22.7%). Few complications occurred on day of surgery. At 90 days, 3.2% of patients had bowel complications, 2.0% urological, 9.4% infectious, and 1.5% stroke. Overall, bowel, neurological health event occurrences were consistent with prior year rates, while infectious events decreased. Of 206 patients who were followed for at least 5 years, 17.3% had devices removed and 11.3% replaced, with 26.1% having at least one of those, leaving 73.9% with original devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Urological, infectious, and bowel complication occurrences were low after SNS among Medicare beneficiaries with multiple comorbidities. There were infrequent serious complications like hemorrhage and stroke postoperatively. Although SNS appears safe in this high-risk population, a comprehensive registry will ensure continuous safety.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  InterStim; neurogenic bladder; overactive bladder; sacral nerve modulation (SNM); sacral nerve stimulation (SNS)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25066920     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of sacral neuromodulation in modern urogynaecology practice: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Samina Tahseen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Failures of Sacral Neuromodulation for Incontinence.

Authors:  Bilal Chughtai; Dominique Thomas; Tianyi Sun; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Leptomeningeal disease: current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Gautam Nayar; Tiffany Ejikeme; Pakawat Chongsathidkiet; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Kimberly L Blackwell; Jeffrey M Clarke; Shivanand P Lad; Peter E Fecci
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-16

Review 4.  Axonics Sacral Neuromodulation System for Treating Refractory Overactive Bladder: A NICE Medical Technologies Guidance.

Authors:  Ruth Louise Poole; Megan Dale; Helen Morgan; Tosin Oladapo; Rebecca Brookfield; Rhys Morris
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Does age alone negatively predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation? A single-centre retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Tobias Bukethal; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.