| Literature DB >> 25066768 |
Chris H H Chan1, Ina Laura Pieper, Rebecca Hambly, Gemma Radley, Alyssa Jones, Yasmin Friedmann, Karl M Hawkins, Stephen Westaby, Graham Foster, Catherine A Thornton.
Abstract
Implantable ventricular assist devices (VADs) have proven efficient in advanced heart failure patients as a bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy. However, VAD usage often leads to infection, bleeding, and thrombosis, side effects attributable to the damage to blood cells and plasma proteins. Measuring hemolysis alone does not provide sufficient information to understand total blood damage, and research exploring the impact of currently available pumps on a wider range of blood cell types and plasma proteins such as von Willebrand factor (vWF) is required to further our understanding of safer pump design. The extracorporeal CentriMag (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) has a hemolysis profile within published standards of normalized index of hemolysis levels of less than 0.01 g/100 L at 100 mm Hg but the effect on leukocytes, vWF multimers, and platelets is unknown. Here, the CentriMag was tested using bovine blood (n = 15) under constant hemodynamic conditions in comparison with a static control for total blood cell counts, hemolysis, leukocyte death, vWF multimers, microparticles, platelet activation, and apoptosis. The CentriMag decreased the levels of healthy leukocytes (P < 0.006), induced leukocyte microparticles (P < 10(-5) ), and the level of high molecular weight of vWF multimers was significantly reduced in the CentriMag (P < 10(-5) ) all compared with the static treatment after 6 h in vitro testing. Despite the leukocyte damage, microparticle formation, and cleavage of vWF multimers, these results show that the CentriMag is a hemocompatible pump which could be used as a standard in blood damage assays to inform the design of new implantable blood pumps.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Cell-derived microparticles; CentriMag centrifugal pump; Hemolysis; Leukocyte damage; Platelet activation; von Willebrand factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25066768 PMCID: PMC4338790 DOI: 10.1111/aor.12351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Artif Organs ISSN: 0160-564X Impact factor: 3.094
FIG 3Leukocyte damage measured by flow cytometry. Whole bovine blood tested in the CentriMag (top row) versus static control (middle row) at 6 h. Leukocytes gate used to record 10 000 events. Ungated events displayed on CD45-PE versus SSC density plot and CD45+ events gated. CD45+ events displayed on 7AAD versus SSC density plot and healthy (7AAD-high SSC), necrotic (7AAD+), and microparticles (MPs; 7AAD- low SSC) events recorded for each sample. CentriMag caused a significant decrease in relative healthy events (bottom left) (P < 0.006) and significant increase in relative MP events after 3 h (P < 10−5), indicating that leukocytes are fragmented during the pumping process. Significant difference between CentriMag and static control.
FIG 1CentriMag's effect on blood cell levels. Whole bovine blood diluted to hematocrit of 30 ± 2% with PBS and pumped for 6 h through a circuit by the CentriMag and compared with a static control kept in a 37°C water bath. Total leukocytes, platelets, and erythrocytes blood counts obtained by the CELL-DYN Ruby automatic hematology analyzer plotted against time (n = 6–7, x ± SD). There is no difference between CentriMag and static blood in terms of blood cell levels.
FIG 2Hemolysis evaluation. Comparison of changes in plasma-free hemoglobin (ΔpfHb) between the CentriMag temporary mechanical circulatory support device and the static control (n = 15). There was no significant difference between CentriMag and static at hour 6 (P = 0.487), indicating that the CentriMag does not cause high-level hemolysis. NIH for the CentriMag was 0.0011 ± 0.0005 g/100 L (n = 15; x ± SD).
FIG 4Platelet activation and apoptosis. Whole blood sampled hourly from the pump circuit (CentriMag) or the control (static) single-stained with BAQ125, CAPP2a, or Annexin V, and gated as described in Supporting Information Fig. S2. Top: percentage BAQ125- events; middle: percentage CAPP2a- events; and bottom: percentage Annexin V+ events (n = 7, x ± SD). No significant difference is observed between CentriMag and static control during the 6 h tests.
FIG 5HMW vWF degradation. Platelet-poor plasma isolated from blood sampled hourly from the pump circuit (CentriMag) or the static control (n = 7) and analyzed by immunoblotting (top) and densitometry of the blot (bottom). Bottom graph: time versus rate of change in the gradient of HMW vWF. The level of the HMW vWF multimers is significantly lower in the CentriMag compared with the static control (P < 10−5) from around 3 h, and this increases over time.