Literature DB >> 25066551

Independent data monitoring committees: preparing a path for the future.

Connie N Hess1, Matthew T Roe2, C Michael Gibson3, Robert J Temple4, Michael J Pencina1, Deborah A Zarin5, Kevin J Anstrom3, John H Alexander1, Rachel E Sherman4, Fred T Fiedorek6, Kenneth W Mahaffey7, Kerry L Lee1, Shein-Chung Chow8, Paul W Armstrong9, Robert M Califf8.   

Abstract

Independent data monitoring committees (IDMCs) were introduced to monitor patient safety and study conduct in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but certain challenges regarding the utilization of IDMCs have developed. First, the roles and responsibilities of IDMCs are expanding, perhaps due to increasing trial complexity and heterogeneity regarding medical, ethical, legal, regulatory, and financial issues. Second, no standard for IDMC operating procedures exists, and there is uncertainty about who should determine standards and whether standards should vary with trial size and design. Third, considerable variability in communication pathways exist across IDMC interfaces with regulatory agencies, academic coordinating centers, and sponsors. Finally, there has been a substantial increase in the number of RCTs using IDMCs, yet there is no set of qualifications to help guide the training and development of the next generation of IDMC members. Recently, an expert panel of representatives from government, industry, and academia assembled at the Duke Clinical Research Institute to address these challenges and to develop recommendations for the future utilization of IDMCs in RCTs.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25066551      PMCID: PMC4181557          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  11 in total

1.  Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Pierluigi Tricoci; Zhen Huang; Claes Held; David J Moliterno; Paul W Armstrong; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey D White; Philip E Aylward; Lars Wallentin; Edmond Chen; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Jinglan Pei; Sergio Leonardi; Tyrus L Rorick; Ann M Kilian; Lisa H K Jennings; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Christoph Bode; Angel Cequier; Jan H Cornel; Rafael Diaz; Aycan Erkan; Kurt Huber; Michael P Hudson; Lixin Jiang; J Wouter Jukema; Basil S Lewis; A Michael Lincoff; Gilles Montalescot; José Carlos Nicolau; Hisao Ogawa; Matthias Pfisterer; Juan Carlos Prieto; Witold Ruzyllo; Peter R Sinnaeve; Robert F Storey; Marco Valgimigli; David J Whellan; Petr Widimsky; John Strony; Robert A Harrington; Kenneth W Mahaffey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 19-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Deborah A Zarin; Judith M Kramer; Rachel E Sherman; Laura H Aberle; Asba Tasneem
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Data and safety monitoring boards: academic credit where credit is due?

Authors:  Paul W Armstrong; Robert M Califf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Organization, review, and administration of cooperative studies (Greenberg Report): a report from the Heart Special Project Committee to the National Advisory Heart Council, May 1967.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1988-06

6.  Liability issues for data monitoring committee members.

Authors:  David L DeMets; Thomas R Fleming; Frank Rockhold; Barry Massie; Thomas Merchant; Alan Meisel; Barbara Mishkin; Janet Wittes; David Stump; Robert Califf
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Rebecca J Williams; Robert M Califf; Nicholas C Ide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes; Stefan James; Rakhi Kilaru; Yaohua He; Puneet Mohan; Deepak L Bhatt; Shaun Goodman; Freek W Verheugt; Marcus Flather; Kurt Huber; Danny Liaw; Steen E Husted; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Raffaele De Caterina; Petr Jansky; Harald Darius; Dragos Vinereanu; Jan H Cornel; Frank Cools; Dan Atar; Jose Luis Leiva-Pons; Matyas Keltai; Hisao Ogawa; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Witold Ruzyllo; Rafael Diaz; Harvey White; Mikhail Ruda; Margarida Geraldes; Jack Lawrence; Robert A Harrington; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Analyses of cancer data from three ezetimibe trials.

Authors:  Richard Peto; Jonathan Emberson; Martin Landray; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Robert Clare; Robert Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Gregory G Schwartz; Anders G Olsson; Markus Abt; Christie M Ballantyne; Philip J Barter; Jochen Brumm; Bernard R Chaitman; Ingar M Holme; David Kallend; Lawrence A Leiter; Eran Leitersdorf; John J V McMurray; Hardi Mundl; Stephen J Nicholls; Prediman K Shah; Jean-Claude Tardif; R Scott Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Developing training for Data Safety Monitoring Board members: A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases case study.

Authors:  Judith Zuckerman; Barbara van der Schalie; Kelly Cahill
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Adrian F Hernandez; Lisa G Berdan; Tyrus Rorick; Emily C O'Brien; Jenny C Ibarra; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Susan S Ellenberg; Richard Culbertson; Daniel L Gillen; Steven Goodman; Suzanne Schrandt; Maryan Zirkle
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; David L DeMets; Matthew T Roe; Janet Wittes; Karim A Calis; Amit N Vora; Alan Meisel; Raymond P Bain; Marvin A Konstam; Michael J Pencina; David J Gordon; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Charles H Hennekens; James D Neaton; Gail D Pearson; Tomas Lg Andersson; Marc A Pfeffer; Susan S Ellenberg
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  Reporting of data monitoring boards in publications of randomized clinical trials is often deficient: ACTTION systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gewandter; Rachel A Kitt; Matthew R Hunsinger; Joseph Poku; Jacqueline Lozano; Jenna Chaudari; Scott Evans; Robert A Gross; Michael P McDermott; Michael C Rowbotham; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  "You have to keep your nerve on a DMC." Challenges for Data Monitoring Committees in neonatal intensive care trials: Qualitative accounts from the BRACELET Study.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Peter Brocklehurst; Robert C Tasker; Martin Ward Platt; Diana Elbourne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.