BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis we review the findings from neuropsychological studies on set-shifting in people with eating disorders (EDs) or overweight/obesity. METHOD: Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX and Web of Science) were searched for eligible studies. Effect sizes (ESs) were pooled using random-effects models. Moderator analyses were conducted for ED and overweight/obese subgroups, adult/adolescent samples and measures of set-shifting. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies with a total of 1825 ED patients [1394 anorexia nervosa (AN), 376 bulimia nervosa (BN) and 55 binge eating disorder (BED)] and 10 studies with a total of 449 overweight/obese individuals were included. The meta-analysis revealed a small to medium ES for inefficient set-shifting across all three ED diagnoses (Hedges' g = -0.45). Subgroup analyses yielded small to medium ESs for each ED subtype (g = -0.44 for AN, -0.53 for BED, -0.50 for BN), which did not differ significantly. There was a medium ES for restricting type AN (ANR; g = -0.51) but no significant ES for binge/purge type AN (AN/BP; g = -0.18). A medium ES was found across obesity studies (g = -0.61). The ES across overweight studies was not significant (g = -0.07). Adult samples did not differ from adolescent samples in either ED or overweight/obesity studies. The different set-shifting measures were associated with largely varying ESs. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis provides strong support that inefficient set-shifting is a salient neuropsychological phenomenon across ED subtypes and obesity, but is less prominent in AN/BP and overweight. Compulsivity seems to be a common underlying factor supporting a dimensional and transdiagnostic conceptualization of EDs and obesity.
BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis we review the findings from neuropsychological studies on set-shifting in people with eating disorders (EDs) or overweight/obesity. METHOD: Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX and Web of Science) were searched for eligible studies. Effect sizes (ESs) were pooled using random-effects models. Moderator analyses were conducted for ED and overweight/obese subgroups, adult/adolescent samples and measures of set-shifting. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies with a total of 1825 ED patients [1394 anorexia nervosa (AN), 376 bulimia nervosa (BN) and 55 binge eating disorder (BED)] and 10 studies with a total of 449 overweight/obese individuals were included. The meta-analysis revealed a small to medium ES for inefficient set-shifting across all three ED diagnoses (Hedges' g = -0.45). Subgroup analyses yielded small to medium ESs for each ED subtype (g = -0.44 for AN, -0.53 for BED, -0.50 for BN), which did not differ significantly. There was a medium ES for restricting type AN (ANR; g = -0.51) but no significant ES for binge/purge type AN (AN/BP; g = -0.18). A medium ES was found across obesity studies (g = -0.61). The ES across overweight studies was not significant (g = -0.07). Adult samples did not differ from adolescent samples in either ED or overweight/obesity studies. The different set-shifting measures were associated with largely varying ESs. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis provides strong support that inefficient set-shifting is a salient neuropsychological phenomenon across ED subtypes and obesity, but is less prominent in AN/BP and overweight. Compulsivity seems to be a common underlying factor supporting a dimensional and transdiagnostic conceptualization of EDs and obesity.
Authors: J M J Coumans; U N Danner; W Ahrens; A Hebestreit; T Intemann; Y A Kourides; L Lissner; N Michels; L A Moreno; P Russo; S Stomfai; T Veidebaum; R A H Adan Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Stephanie Miles; Caitlin A Howlett; Carolyn Berryman; Maja Nedeljkovic; G Lorimer Moseley; Andrea Phillipou Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2021-03-22
Authors: Teena D Moody; Vivian W Shen; Nathan L Hutcheson; Jennifer R Henretty; Courtney L Sheen; Michael Strober; Jamie D Feusner Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 4.861