B van Oosterhout1, L Krabbendam2, K de Boer3, J Ferwerda4, M van der Helm5, A D Stant6, M van der Gaag7. 1. GGzE, De Woenselse Poort, Eindhoven,The Netherlands. 2. Department of Educational Neuroscience,VU University Amsterdam,The Netherlands. 3. Retired clinical psychologist, Heiloo,The Netherlands. 4. GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, Heiloo,The Netherlands. 5. Centre for Early Psychosis,Parnassia Psychiatric Institute,The Hague,The Netherlands. 6. Department of Epidemiology,University Medical Centre Groningen,The Netherlands. 7. Department of Psychosis Research,Parnassia Psychiatric Institute,The Hague,The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Metacognitive training (MCT) for patients with psychosis is a psychological group intervention that aims to educate patients about common cognitive biases underlying delusion formation and maintenance, and to highlight their negative consequences in daily functioning. METHOD: In this randomized controlled trial, 154 schizophrenia spectrum patients with delusions were randomly assigned to either MCT + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Both groups were assessed at baseline, and again after 8 and 24 weeks. The trial was completed fully by 111 patients. Efficacy was measured with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusions Rating Scale (DRS), and with specific secondary measures referring to persecutory ideas and ideas of social reference (the Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, GPTS), cognitive insight (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, BCIS), subjective experiences of cognitive biases (the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale, DACOBS) and metacognitive beliefs (the 30-item Metacognitions Questionnaire, MCQ-30). Economic analysis focused on the balance between societal costs and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs). RESULTS: Both conditions showed a decrease of delusions. MCT was not more efficacious in terms of reducing delusions, nor did it change subjective paranoid thinking and ideas of social reference, cognitive insight or subjective experience of cognitive biases and metacognitive beliefs. The results of the economic analysis were not in favour of MCT + TAU. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, MCT did not affect delusion scores and self-reported cognitive insight, or subjective experience of cognitive biases and metacognitive beliefs. MCT was not cost-effective.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Metacognitive training (MCT) for patients with psychosis is a psychological group intervention that aims to educate patients about common cognitive biases underlying delusion formation and maintenance, and to highlight their negative consequences in daily functioning. METHOD: In this randomized controlled trial, 154 schizophrenia spectrum patients with delusions were randomly assigned to either MCT + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Both groups were assessed at baseline, and again after 8 and 24 weeks. The trial was completed fully by 111 patients. Efficacy was measured with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusions Rating Scale (DRS), and with specific secondary measures referring to persecutory ideas and ideas of social reference (the Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, GPTS), cognitive insight (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, BCIS), subjective experiences of cognitive biases (the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale, DACOBS) and metacognitive beliefs (the 30-item Metacognitions Questionnaire, MCQ-30). Economic analysis focused on the balance between societal costs and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs). RESULTS: Both conditions showed a decrease of delusions. MCT was not more efficacious in terms of reducing delusions, nor did it change subjective paranoid thinking and ideas of social reference, cognitive insight or subjective experience of cognitive biases and metacognitive beliefs. The results of the economic analysis were not in favour of MCT + TAU. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, MCT did not affect delusion scores and self-reported cognitive insight, or subjective experience of cognitive biases and metacognitive beliefs. MCT was not cost-effective.
Authors: Irene Bighelli; Georgia Salanti; Maximilian Huhn; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Marc Krause; Cornelia Reitmeir; Sofia Wallis; Felicitas Schwermann; Gabi Pitschel-Walz; Corrado Barbui; Toshi A Furukawa; Stefan Leucht Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Michelle L Pattison; Bethany L Leonhardt; Scott Phelps; Jenifer L Vohs Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Helen Waller; Richard Emsley; Daniel Freeman; Paul Bebbington; Graham Dunn; David Fowler; Amy Hardy; Elizabeth Kuipers; Philippa Garety Journal: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-24
Authors: Philippa Garety; Helen Waller; Richard Emsley; Suzanne Jolley; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Graham Dunn; David Fowler; Amy Hardy; Daniel Freeman Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 9.306