Literature DB >> 25065472

Is preference a predictor of enrichment efficacy in Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis nigra)?

Lindsay R Mehrkam1, Nicole R Dorey.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that environmental enrichment plays an important role in promoting the welfare of captive animals. However, a topic of debate is whether an animal's preference for an enrichment strategy is any indicator of its efficacy. In addition, relatively few studies have evaluated environmental enrichment strategies for non-mammalian species. In the present study, we compared the results of an observational evaluation of enrichment efficacy with the results of a paired-stimulus preference assessment for three Galapagos tortoises. In the observational study, object enrichment (boomer balls and a free-flowing sprinkler) and keeper interactions (shell scrubbing and neck rubbing) were evaluated systematically for their effects on locomotion, species-typical behavior, aggressive and non-aggressive conspecific interactions, and enclosure. Preference assessments were subsequently conducted in which subjects could choose the enrichment strategy to be implemented. All subjects preferred keeper interactions consistently over object enrichment. Our results suggest that enrichment preference was a variable predictor of efficacy across enrichment species-typical behavior, activity levels, enclosure use, and aggressive and non-aggressive conspecific interactions strategies. Preference predicted efficacy for promoting species-typical behavior (1/3 subjects), activity levels (2/3 subjects), and enclosure use (2/3 subjects), but not conspecific interactions (0/3 subjects). The results suggest that preference may be an efficient predictor of enrichment efficacy when daily observational evaluations are not practical; however, the predictive utility of preference assessments may depend on the behavioral goal of the enrichment strategy. We discuss the need for future research examining the relationship between preference and enrichment efficacy-as well as other potential indicators of enrichment effectiveness-in captive animals.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; enrichment; interactions; keeper; reptiles

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25065472     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  10 in total

1.  Making a Tiger's Day: Free-Operant Assessment and Environmental Enrichment to Improve the Daily Lives of Captive Bengal Tigers (Panthera tigris tigris).

Authors:  Michael Clayton; Trista Shrock
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2020-09-22

2.  Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Molly McGuire; Jessica Leete
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Allison L Martin; Andrea N Franklin; Jaine E Perlman; Mollie A Bloomsmith
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Stability of infants' preference for prosocial others: Implications for research based on single-choice paradigms.

Authors:  Tyler Nighbor; Carolynn Kohn; Matthew Normand; Henry Schlinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Selecting and Testing Environmental Enrichment in Lemurs.

Authors:  Eduardo J Fernandez; William Timberlake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Documenting Aggression, Dominance and the Impacts of Visitor Interaction on Galápagos Tortoises (Chelonoidis nigra) in a Zoo Setting.

Authors:  Laura Freeland; Charlotte Ellis; Christopher J Michaels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Matter of Non-Avian Reptile Sentience, and Why It "Matters" to Them: A Conceptual, Ethical and Scientific Review.

Authors:  Mark James Learmonth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Investigating the Behavior and Personality Structure of the Aldabra Tortoise during Human Interactions and Training Events.

Authors:  Giovanni Quintavalle Pastorino; Vanessa Smith; Massimo Faustini; Eleonora Bonacina; Davide Guadagnini; Roberto Robbiati; Alice Cavalleri; James Edward Brereton; Richard Preziosi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Survey on the Past Decade of Technology in Animal Enrichment: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  K Cassie Kresnye; Chia-Fang Chung; Christopher Flynn Martin; Patrick C Shih
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

10.  A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Jordyn Truax; Molly C McGuire
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.