Kaiyun Chen1, Guihua Chen2, Hanning Wang3, Hua Li2, Jinfeng Xiao3, Xiaopeng Duan3, Jiwen He3, Ke He3, Guoan Xiang4. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Emergency Hospital, South Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Department of Hepatology Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: chky3213300@126.com. 2. Department of Hepatology Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Emergency Hospital, South Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Emergency Hospital, South Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: guoan_66@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation results in better progression-free survival compared with the use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS:136 patients were randomly assigned to undergo HCC treatment with RFA and percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation (RFA-(125)I, n=68) or RFA-only (n=68). A total of 91 patients had hepatitis B viral infection in both groups. Rates of tumour recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The probabilities of recurrence at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 4.5%, 22.1%, and 39.8% in the RFA-(125)I group; and 14.8%, 35.3%, and 57.4% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The recurrence rate in the RFA-(125)I group was significantly lower than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.317-0.815; p=0.004 by log-rank test). Local and intrahepatic recurrence was significantly lower in the RFA-(125)I group than in the RFA-only group (7.3% vs. 22.0%, p=0.012 by log-rank test; 17.6% vs. 32.3%, p=0.041 by log-rank test). The probabilities of survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100%, 86.7%, and 66.1% in the RFA-(125)I group and 95.6%, 75.0%, and 47.0% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The survival rate in the RFA-(125)I group was significantly better than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.313-0.806; p=0.003 by log-rank test). Cox regression model indicated that the treatment group and tumour size were both recurrence-related and overall survival-related prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in overall survival and cumulative recurrence between RFA-(125)I and RFA-only for patients with small HCCs (⩽3 cm). Treatment with RFA-(125)I facilitated better local and intrahepatic tumour control and long-term survival compared with treatment of RFA alone. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01717729.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation results in better progression-free survival compared with the use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 136 patients were randomly assigned to undergo HCC treatment with RFA and percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation (RFA-(125)I, n=68) or RFA-only (n=68). A total of 91 patients had hepatitis B viral infection in both groups. Rates of tumour recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The probabilities of recurrence at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 4.5%, 22.1%, and 39.8% in the RFA-(125)I group; and 14.8%, 35.3%, and 57.4% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The recurrence rate in the RFA-(125)I group was significantly lower than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.317-0.815; p=0.004 by log-rank test). Local and intrahepatic recurrence was significantly lower in the RFA-(125)I group than in the RFA-only group (7.3% vs. 22.0%, p=0.012 by log-rank test; 17.6% vs. 32.3%, p=0.041 by log-rank test). The probabilities of survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100%, 86.7%, and 66.1% in the RFA-(125)I group and 95.6%, 75.0%, and 47.0% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The survival rate in the RFA-(125)I group was significantly better than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.313-0.806; p=0.003 by log-rank test). Cox regression model indicated that the treatment group and tumour size were both recurrence-related and overall survival-related prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in overall survival and cumulative recurrence between RFA-(125)I and RFA-only for patients with small HCCs (⩽3 cm). Treatment with RFA-(125)I facilitated better local and intrahepatic tumour control and long-term survival compared with treatment of RFA alone. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01717729.
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Thierry De Baere; Laura Kulik; Philipp K Haber; Tim F Greten; Tim Meyer; Riccardo Lencioni Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 46.802