OBJECTIVE: Despite the significant prevalence of adolescent depression, little is known about the neuroanatomical basis of this disorder. Functional dysregulation in frontolimbic circuitry has been suggested as a key neural correlate of adult and adolescent depression impeding emotional regulation. However, less is known about whether this dysregulation is overlaid on impaired white matter microstructure. Guided by neuroimaging findings, we test the a priori hypotheses that adolescent depression is associated with alterations in white matter microstructure in the uncinate fasciculus (UF) and cingulum bundles. METHOD: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) data were obtained on 52 unmedicated adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 42 matched controls. We calculated fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) for bilateral UF and cingulum. We also completed a voxelwise comparison of participants with depression and control participants using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). RESULTS: Adolescents with depression had significantly lower FA and higher RD in bilateral UF; no significant differences were observed in cingulum. TBSS results additionally revealed lower FA values in the white matter associated with the limbic-cortical-striatal-thalamic circuit, corpus callosum, and anterior and superior corona radiata. CONCLUSION: Unmedicated adolescent depression is associated with reduced fractional anisotropy in emotion regulatory networks, which may underlie the functional differences in frontolimbic circuitry characterizing depressive disorder. Given the relatively recent onset of depression in our sample, our findings in the context of the current literature provide preliminary evidence that reduced fractional anisotropy in the UF could be a predisposing risk factor for depression.
OBJECTIVE: Despite the significant prevalence of adolescent depression, little is known about the neuroanatomical basis of this disorder. Functional dysregulation in frontolimbic circuitry has been suggested as a key neural correlate of adult and adolescent depression impeding emotional regulation. However, less is known about whether this dysregulation is overlaid on impaired white matter microstructure. Guided by neuroimaging findings, we test the a priori hypotheses that adolescent depression is associated with alterations in white matter microstructure in the uncinate fasciculus (UF) and cingulum bundles. METHOD: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) data were obtained on 52 unmedicated adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 42 matched controls. We calculated fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) for bilateral UF and cingulum. We also completed a voxelwise comparison of participants with depression and control participants using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). RESULTS: Adolescents with depression had significantly lower FA and higher RD in bilateral UF; no significant differences were observed in cingulum. TBSS results additionally revealed lower FA values in the white matter associated with the limbic-cortical-striatal-thalamic circuit, corpus callosum, and anterior and superior corona radiata. CONCLUSION: Unmedicated adolescent depression is associated with reduced fractional anisotropy in emotion regulatory networks, which may underlie the functional differences in frontolimbic circuitry characterizing depressive disorder. Given the relatively recent onset of depression in our sample, our findings in the context of the current literature provide preliminary evidence that reduced fractional anisotropy in the UF could be a predisposing risk factor for depression.
Authors: Sanne de Wit; Poppy Watson; Helga A Harsay; Michael X Cohen; Irene van de Vijver; K Richard Ridderinkhof Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Kathryn R Cullen; Dylan G Gee; Bonnie Klimes-Dougan; Vilma Gabbay; Leslie Hulvershorn; Bryon A Mueller; Jazmin Camchong; Christopher J Bell; Alaa Houri; Sanjiv Kumra; Kelvin O Lim; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Maria Jalbrzikowski; Bart Larsen; Michael N Hallquist; William Foran; Finnegan Calabro; Beatriz Luna Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephanie S G Brown; John W Rutland; Gaurav Verma; Rebecca E Feldman; Molly Schneider; Bradley N Delman; James M Murrough; Priti Balchandani Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2019-08-13
Authors: Olga Tymofiyeva; Eva Henje Blom; Tiffany C Ho; Colm G Connolly; Daniel Lindqvist; Owen M Wolkowitz; Jue Lin; Kaja Z LeWinn; Matthew D Sacchet; Laura K M Han; Justin P Yuan; Sarina P Bhandari; Duan Xu; Tony T Yang Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Yuwen Hung; Zeynep M Saygin; Joseph Biederman; Dina Hirshfeld-Becker; Mai Uchida; Oliver Doehrmann; Michelle Han; Xiaoqian J Chai; Tara Kenworthy; Pavel Yarmak; Schuyler L Gaillard; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; John D E Gabrieli Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Olga Tymofiyeva; Colm G Connolly; Tiffany C Ho; Matthew D Sacchet; Eva Henje Blom; Kaja Z LeWinn; Duan Xu; Tony T Yang Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 4.839