Kendell L Coker1, Philip H Smith2, Alexander Westphal3, Howard V Zonana1, Sherry A McKee4. 1. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 2. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; School of Public Health at Yale University School of Medicine. 3. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale Child Study Center. 4. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: sherry.mckee@yale.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Current knowledge regarding psychiatric disorders and crime in youth is limited to juvenile justice and community samples. This study examined relationships between psychiatric disorders and self-reported crime involvement in a sample of youth representative of the US population. METHOD: The National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (N = 10,123; ages 13-17 years; 2001-2004) was used to examine the relationship between lifetime DSM-IV-based diagnoses, reported crime (property, violent, other), and arrest history. Logistic regression compared the odds of reported crime involvement with specific psychiatric disorders to those without any diagnoses, and examined the odds of crime by psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Prevalence of crime was 18.4%. Youth with lifetime psychiatric disorders, compared to no disorders, had significantly greater odds of crime, including violent crime. For violent crime resulting in arrest, conduct disorder (CD) (odds ratio OR = 57.5; 95% CI = 30.4, 108.8), alcohol use disorders (OR = 19.5; 95% CI = 8.8, 43.2), and drug use disorders (OR = 16.1; 95% CI = 9.3, 27.7) had the greatest odds with similar findings for violent crime with no arrest. Psychiatric comorbidity increased the odds of crime. Youth with 3 or more diagnoses (16.0% of population) accounted for 54.1% of those reporting arrest for violent crime. Youth with at least 1 diagnosis committed 85.8% of crime, which was reduced to 67.9% by removing individuals with CD. Importantly, 88.2% of youth with mental illness reported never having committed any crime. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of improving access to mental health services for youthful offenders in community settings, given the substantial associations found between mental illness and crime in this nationally representative epidemiological sample.
OBJECTIVE: Current knowledge regarding psychiatric disorders and crime in youth is limited to juvenile justice and community samples. This study examined relationships between psychiatric disorders and self-reported crime involvement in a sample of youth representative of the US population. METHOD: The National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (N = 10,123; ages 13-17 years; 2001-2004) was used to examine the relationship between lifetime DSM-IV-based diagnoses, reported crime (property, violent, other), and arrest history. Logistic regression compared the odds of reported crime involvement with specific psychiatric disorders to those without any diagnoses, and examined the odds of crime by psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Prevalence of crime was 18.4%. Youth with lifetime psychiatric disorders, compared to no disorders, had significantly greater odds of crime, including violent crime. For violent crime resulting in arrest, conduct disorder (CD) (odds ratio OR = 57.5; 95% CI = 30.4, 108.8), alcohol use disorders (OR = 19.5; 95% CI = 8.8, 43.2), and drug use disorders (OR = 16.1; 95% CI = 9.3, 27.7) had the greatest odds with similar findings for violent crime with no arrest. Psychiatric comorbidity increased the odds of crime. Youth with 3 or more diagnoses (16.0% of population) accounted for 54.1% of those reporting arrest for violent crime. Youth with at least 1 diagnosis committed 85.8% of crime, which was reduced to 67.9% by removing individuals with CD. Importantly, 88.2% of youth with mental illness reported never having committed any crime. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of improving access to mental health services for youthful offenders in community settings, given the substantial associations found between mental illness and crime in this nationally representative epidemiological sample.
Authors: Darrick Jolliffe; David P Farrington; J David Hawkins; Richard F Catalano; Karl G Hill; Rick Kosterman Journal: Crim Behav Ment Health Date: 2003
Authors: Joel Swendsen; Marcy Burstein; Brady Case; Kevin P Conway; Lisa Dierker; Jianping He; Kathleen R Merikangas Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-04
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Shelli Avenevoli; E Jane Costello; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Steven Heeringa; Kathleen R Merikangas; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Rose M C Kagawa; Dahsan S Gary; Garen J Wintemute; Kara E Rudolph; Veronica A Pear; Katherine Keyes; Magdalena Cerdá Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kelly E Moore; Lindsay M S Oberleitner; Howard V Zonana; Alec W Buchanan; Brian P Pittman; Terril L Verplaetse; Gustavo A Angarita; Walter Roberts; Sherry A McKee Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Joseph T Sakai; Manish S Dalwani; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Kristen Raymond; Shannon McWilliams; Jody Tanabe; Don Rojas; Michael Regner; Marie T Banich; Thomas J Crowley Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2017-03-11 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Joseph T Sakai; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Susan E Young; Soo Hyun Rhee; Shannon K McWilliams; Robin Dunn; Stacy Salomonsen-Sautel; Christian Thurstone; Christian J Hopfer Journal: J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse Date: 2016-06-16
Authors: Joseph T Sakai; Manish S Dalwani; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Shannon K McWilliams; Kristen M Raymond; Thomas J Crowley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240