Bonnie I Glanz1, Alexander Musallam1, David J Rintell1, Tanuja Chitnis1, Howard L Weiner1, Brian C Healy1. 1. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA (BIG, DJR, TC, HLW, BCH); Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA (BIG, AM, DJR, TC, HLW, BCH); and Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA (BCH).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with inconvenient methods of administration, significant side effects, and low adherence rates. This study was undertaken to compare treatment satisfaction in MS patients treated with interferon beta-1a intramuscular (IFNβ-1a IM), interferon beta-1a subcutaneous (IFNβ-1a SC), glatiramer acetate (GA), and natalizumab (NTZ), and to examine the associations between treatment satisfaction ratings and adherence to therapy. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six treated MS patients completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine. Multivariable models were used to compare treatment satisfaction across groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in overall treatment satisfaction. The NTZ group reported greater satisfaction with the ability of the medication to treat or prevent MS than the IFNβ-1a IM group. The NTZ group also reported higher overall convenience scores than the IFNβ-1a IM group and greater satisfaction with ease of use of the medication than the interferon and GA groups. Patients in the IFNβ-1a IM group reported less satisfaction with ease of planning when to use the medication than those in the other groups. Convenience was associated with adherence in IFNβ-1a SC- and GA-treated patients, with lower convenience scores associated with lower adherence. CONCLUSIONS: These results may be useful to MS patients and health-care providers facing decisions about DMT use.
BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with inconvenient methods of administration, significant side effects, and low adherence rates. This study was undertaken to compare treatment satisfaction in MSpatients treated with interferon beta-1a intramuscular (IFNβ-1a IM), interferon beta-1a subcutaneous (IFNβ-1a SC), glatiramer acetate (GA), and natalizumab (NTZ), and to examine the associations between treatment satisfaction ratings and adherence to therapy. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six treated MSpatients completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine. Multivariable models were used to compare treatment satisfaction across groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in overall treatment satisfaction. The NTZ group reported greater satisfaction with the ability of the medication to treat or prevent MS than the IFNβ-1a IM group. The NTZ group also reported higher overall convenience scores than the IFNβ-1a IM group and greater satisfaction with ease of use of the medication than the interferon and GA groups. Patients in the IFNβ-1a IM group reported less satisfaction with ease of planning when to use the medication than those in the other groups. Convenience was associated with adherence in IFNβ-1a SC- and GA-treated patients, with lower convenience scores associated with lower adherence. CONCLUSIONS: These results may be useful to MSpatients and health-care providers facing decisions about DMT use.
Authors: Robert J Fox; David H Miller; J Theodore Phillips; Michael Hutchinson; Eva Havrdova; Mariko Kita; Minhua Yang; Kartik Raghupathi; Mark Novas; Marianne T Sweetser; Vissia Viglietta; Katherine T Dawson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: V Devonshire; Y Lapierre; R Macdonell; C Ramo-Tello; F Patti; P Fontoura; L Suchet; R Hyde; I Balla; E M Frohman; B C Kieseier Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Paul O'Connor; Jerry S Wolinsky; Christian Confavreux; Giancarlo Comi; Ludwig Kappos; Tomas P Olsson; Hadj Benzerdjeb; Philippe Truffinet; Lin Wang; Aaron Miller; Mark S Freedman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K P Johnson; B R Brooks; J A Cohen; C C Ford; J Goldstein; R P Lisak; L W Myers; H S Panitch; J W Rose; R B Schiffer; T Vollmer; L P Weiner; J S Wolinsky Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ludwig Kappos; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Paul O'Connor; Chris Polman; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Peter Calabresi; Krzysztof Selmaj; Catherine Agoropoulou; Malgorzata Leyk; Lixin Zhang-Auberson; Pascale Burtin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L D Jacobs; D L Cookfair; R A Rudick; R M Herndon; J R Richert; A M Salazar; J S Fischer; D E Goodkin; C V Granger; J H Simon; J J Alam; D M Bartoszak; D N Bourdette; J Braiman; C M Brownscheidle; M E Coats; S L Cohan; D S Dougherty; R P Kinkel; M K Mass; F E Munschauer; R L Priore; P M Pullicino; B J Scherokman; R H Whitham Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrew V Thach; Carolyn M Brown; Vivian Herrera; Rahul Sasane; Jamie C Barner; Kentya C Ford; Kenneth A Lawson Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2018 Nov-Dec
Authors: Diego Centonze; Roberta Fantozzi; Fabio Buttari; Luigi Maria Edoardo Grimaldi; Rocco Totaro; Francesco Corea; Maria Giovanna Marrosu; Paolo Confalonieri; Salvatore Cottone; Maria Trojano; Valentina Zipoli Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 4.003