Literature DB >> 25060973

Bio-Oss(®) for delayed osseointegration of implants in dogs: a histological study.

Hui-ying Liu1, Hui Zheng2, Xi-peng Hou3, Wei-jian Zhong3, Xiao-xia Ying1, Song-ling Chai3, Guo-wu Ma4.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of Bio-Oss® (a natural bone substitute derived from the mineral portion of bovine bone) on delayed osseointegration of implants. The bilateral third and fourth mandibular premolars of 4 adult, healthy, male and female dogs were extracted. We randomly selected 2 extraction sockets in each dog to be filled with Bio-Oss® (the experimental group); the other 2 extraction sockets, which were not treated, served as controls. Dental implants were inserted into the alveolar bone of the experimental group and the control group 3 months after insertion of the Bio-Oss®. The osteogenic activity in the bone around the implants was assessed by evaluating the histological morphology and estimating histomorphometric variables at 3 and 6 months after delayed implantation. After 3 months, Goldner's trichrome staining analysis showed that the rate of content between the bone and the implant and the mineralised area of bone around the implant were significantly higher in the experimental group (76%(9%) and 69.5% (9.6%), respectively) than those in the control group (56.1% (8.2%) and 52.8% (7.3%), respectively, p=0.003 and 0.000). However, the 2 groups did not differ significantly at 6 months. Fluorescence microscopy showed that the mean rates of mineralisation of the bony tissue around the implant in the experimental group at months 3 and 6 were 6.8 (0.4) μm and 8.4 (0.8) μm, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (p=0.000 and 0.03). These data indicate that putting Bio-Oss® into the extraction sockets can promote osseointegration after delayed implantation, and may be a promising option for clinical use.
Copyright © 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-Oss®; delayed implantation; implant; osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060973     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  4 in total

1.  A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Carlos Ricardo de Queiroz Martiniano; Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas; Jose Ronildo Lins do Carmo Filho; Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves; Mara Assef Leitão Lotif; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas; Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha Rodrigues; Carlos Eduardo Francischone
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Is Impregnation of Xenograft with Caffeine Effective on Bone Healing Rate in Mandibular Defects? A Pilot Histological Animal Study.

Authors:  Sahand Samieirad; Vajiheh Mianbandi; Hamideh Salari Sedigh; Majid Hosseini-Abrishami; Farid Shiezadeh; Hossein Bagheri; Elahe Tohidi; Nasrollah Saghravanian
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-03-27

3.  In-vivo performance of plasma-sprayed CaO-MgO-SiO2-based bioactive glass-ceramic coating on Ti-6Al-4V alloy for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Mengjiao Zhang; Ximing Pu; Xianchun Chen; Guangfu Yin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-15

4.  Effect of Multilaminate Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Barrier Membrane on Bone Formation in a Rabbit Mandible Defect Model.

Authors:  Weiyi Wu; Bowen Li; Yuhua Liu; Xinzhi Wang; Lin Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.