Literature DB >> 25060755

Aortic regurgitation severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is underestimated by echocardiography compared with MRI.

Stefan Orwat1, Gerhard-Paul Diller1, Gerrit Kaleschke1, Gregor Kerckhoff1, Aleksander Kempny1, Robert M Radke1, Boris Buerke2, Matthias Burg2, Christoph Schülke2, Helmut Baumgartner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome and its assessment therefore crucial. Quantification of AR by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), however, remains challenging in this setting. The present study used quantitative flow measurement by cardiac MRI (CMR) with calculation of regurgitant fraction (RF) for the assessment of AR and compared the results with TTE. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 65 patients with a mean age of 82.2±8.1 years (38 women) who underwent successful TAVI with Edwards SAPIEN valves (52 transfemoral, 13 transapical). The post-interventional degree of AR was assessed by CMR and by TTE. There was agreement between CMR and TTE with regards to the absence of severe AR. However, TTE significantly underestimated the presence of moderate AR classifying it to be mild in 38 and moderate in only 5 patients, whereas CMR found mild AR in 23 and moderate in 16 patients. Overall, there was only fair agreement between CMR and TTE regarding the grading of AR with a weighted κ of 0.33. The rate of detection of TTE for more than mild AR was only 19%.
CONCLUSIONS: Using CMR for the quantification of AR in a sizeable group of TAVI patients, we demonstrate a strong tendency of TTE to underestimate AR compared with CMR. Since higher AR severity on echocardiography has been associated with worse patient outcome, the potential incremental prognostic value of CMR should be studied prospectively in this setting. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060755     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  9 in total

1.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Hamilton-Craig; Wendy Strugnell; Niranjan Gaikwad; Matthew Ischenko; Vicki Speranza; Jonathan Chan; Johanne Neill; David Platts; Gregory M Scalia; Darryl J Burstow; Darren L Walters
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 2.  Current Management of Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Charles Nadeau-Routhier; Ons Marsit; Jonathan Beaudoin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  Paravalvular Leaks-From Diagnosis to Management.

Authors:  Samuel Bernard; Evin Yucel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

4.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in stratifying paravalvular leak severity after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an observational outcome study.

Authors:  Gregory R Hartlage; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Salim Hayek; Christina Chrysohoou; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Arthur E Stillman; Stephen D Clements; John N Oshinski; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  MRI evaluation prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): When to acquire and how to interpret.

Authors:  Abhishek Chaturvedi; Susan K Hobbs; Fred S Ling; Apeksha Chaturvedi; Peter Knight
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-02-25

6.  Ex Vivo Pilot Study of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping for Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in a Porcine Model in the Presence of a Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Authors:  Nynke H M Kooistra; Freek Nijhoff; Masieh Abawi; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Daniël M Araya Roos; Sjoerd van Tuijl; Niels Blanken; Michiel Voskuil; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Pieter R Stella; Tim Leiner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of mitral paravalvular leakage.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy; Ahmet Güner; Macit Kalçık; Emrah Bayam; Mehmet Özkan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transesophageal echocardiography in patients with prosthetic valve paravalvular leaks: towards an accurate quantification and stratification.

Authors:  Maciej Haberka; Magdalena Malczewska; Piotr Pysz; Michał Kozłowski; Wojciech Wojakowski; Grzegorz Smolka
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Clinical Implications, Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Pablo Antunez-Muiños; Sergio Lopez-Tejero; Pedro L Sanchez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.