Literature DB >> 25060610

Monthly versus as-needed ranibizumab injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion: the SHORE study.

Peter A Campochiaro1, Charles C Wykoff2, Michael Singer3, Robert Johnson4, Dennis Marcus5, Linda Yau6, Gary Sternberg6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pro re nata (PRN) and monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients stabilized by monthly injections.
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, vision-examiner masked, 15-month study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with macular edema secondary to branch or central RVO.
METHODS: Subjects received monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab for 7 months and those meeting stability criteria between months 7 and 14 were randomized (1:1) to PRN injections versus continued monthly injections. Non-randomized (NR) subjects (never met stability criteria) received monthly injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the slope of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between months 7 and 15.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the slope of change in BCVA between months 7 and 15 in patients treated PRN versus those treated with monthly injections (P = 0.509). Mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score at month 15 was 21.0 ± 14.1 in the PRN group (n = 82) versus 18.7 ± 14.1 in the monthly group (n = 80) and 14.5 ± 14.7 in NR subjects (n = 13). The percentage of subjects who achieved BCVA ≥ 20/40 at month 15 was 76.8% in the PRN group, 71.3% in the monthly group, and 46.2% in NR subjects. The mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline central subfield thickness was -247.8 ± 207.5 μm in the PRN group, -289.9 ± 177.2 μm in the monthly group, and -93.2 ± 225.2 μm in NR subjects. There were no significant differences in mean BCVA gains or central subfield thickness reductions at month 15 between the PRN and monthly injection groups (all > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: After edema resolution from 7 or more monthly ranibizumab injections in RVO subjects, visual outcomes at month 15 were excellent and not significantly different in subjects treated PRN versus those who continued monthly injections.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060610     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

Review 1.  [Statement of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on intravitreal treatment of vision-reducing macular edema by retinal vein occlusion : Treatment strategies, status 24 April 2018].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Response to: 'Comment on Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols'.

Authors:  M Ashraf; A A R Souka; R P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals β2 Integrin-mediated Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-induced Retinal Vascular Hyperpermeability.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Jo; Jingi Bae; Sehyun Chae; Jin Hyoung Kim; Jong-Hee Han; Daehee Hwang; Sang-Won Lee; Jeong Hun Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography-Driven Treat-and-Extend and Pro Re Nata Regimen in Patients with Macular Oedema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Evaluation and Outcome Predictors.

Authors:  Maria-Magdalena Guichard; Anton R Xavier; Cengiz Türksever; Christian Pruente; Katja Hatz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  A comparison of three different intravitreal treatment modalities of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Havva Erdogan Kaldırım; Serpil Yazgan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Ten years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

Authors:  Napoleone Ferrara; Anthony P Adamis
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  [Retinal vein occlusion: Therapy of retinal vein occlusion].

Authors:  N Feltgen; A Pielen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Spectral-Domain OCT Predictors of Visual Outcomes after Ranibizumab Treatment for Macular Edema Resulting from Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Glenn Yiu; R Joel Welch; Yinwen Wang; Zhe Wang; Pin-Wen Wang; Zdenka Haskova
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2019-08-28

9.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Zaid Shalchi; Omar Mahroo; Catey Bunce; Danny Mitry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-07

10.  Macular findings obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Muhammet Kazim Erol; Ozdemir Ozdemir; Deniz Turgut Coban; Ahmet Burak Bilgin; Berna Dogan; Esin Sogutlu Sari; Devrim Toslak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.