Ilaria Cutica1, Gordon Mc Vie2, Gabriella Pravettoni3. 1. University of Milan, Department of Health Science, Milan, Italy; Applied Research Unit for Psycho-oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: ilaria.cutica@unimi.it. 2. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. 3. University of Milan, Department of Health Science, Milan, Italy; Applied Research Unit for Psycho-oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the fashion for the "personalised" or "stratified" approach to medicine is valuable in exploiting the omic signatures of the individual patient, too little attention has been paid to the influence of psychological and cognitive factors in the care process. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of those individual psycho-cognitive components in affecting how people act to prevent, cope and react to illness, decide about different therapeutic options, interact with health care providers, and adhere to treatment. METHODS: We reviewed the medical and psychological literature about the effect of cognitive and psychological dimensions on treatment efficacy, on patients' global satisfaction, and on treatment compliance. RESULTS: Psychological dimensions have been proved to impact on treatment efficacy, on patients' global satisfaction, and on compliance to treatment. However, there are substantial individual differences among patients; therefore, it is important that physicians recognise how to apply these general recommendations to each individual patient, alongside the omic information emerging from the molecular diagnostic laboratory. CONCLUSION: The exam of the current literature allows one to derive several strategies which can help health professionals to improve the patients' understanding of their disease and involvement in the whole care process.
BACKGROUND: Although the fashion for the "personalised" or "stratified" approach to medicine is valuable in exploiting the omic signatures of the individual patient, too little attention has been paid to the influence of psychological and cognitive factors in the care process. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of those individual psycho-cognitive components in affecting how people act to prevent, cope and react to illness, decide about different therapeutic options, interact with health care providers, and adhere to treatment. METHODS: We reviewed the medical and psychological literature about the effect of cognitive and psychological dimensions on treatment efficacy, on patients' global satisfaction, and on treatment compliance. RESULTS: Psychological dimensions have been proved to impact on treatment efficacy, on patients' global satisfaction, and on compliance to treatment. However, there are substantial individual differences among patients; therefore, it is important that physicians recognise how to apply these general recommendations to each individual patient, alongside the omic information emerging from the molecular diagnostic laboratory. CONCLUSION: The exam of the current literature allows one to derive several strategies which can help health professionals to improve the patients' understanding of their disease and involvement in the whole care process.
Authors: Jan Buitelaar; Sven Bölte; Daniel Brandeis; Arthur Caye; Nina Christmann; Samuele Cortese; David Coghill; Stephen V Faraone; Barbara Franke; Markus Gleitz; Corina U Greven; Sandra Kooij; Douglas Teixeira Leffa; Nanda Rommelse; Jeffrey H Newcorn; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Luis Augusto Rohde; Emily Simonoff; Mark Stein; Benedetto Vitiello; Yanki Yazgan; Michael Roesler; Manfred Doepfner; Tobias Banaschewski Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Chiara Marzorati; Chiara Renzi; Samuel William Russell-Edu; Gabriella Pravettoni Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Edward Callus; Enrico G Bertoldo; Maria Beretta; Sara Boveri; Rosanna Cardani; Barbara Fossati; Elisa Brigonzi; Giovanni Meola Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 4.003