| Literature DB >> 25060325 |
Atsushi Hamabe1, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Masamitsu Konno, Mamoru Uemura, Junichi Nishimura, Taishi Hata, Ichiro Takemasa, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Naohiro Nishida, Koichi Kawamoto, Jun Koseki, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori, Hideshi Ishii.
Abstract
Although numerous studies have shown the significance of cancer-specific aerobic glycolysis, how glycolysis contributes to tumor invasion, a critical phenomenon in metastasis, remains unclear. With regard to colorectal cancer (CRC), we studied two critical gate enzymes, hexokinase 2 (HK2), which is involved in glycolysis, and phosphorylated pyruvate dehydrogenase-E1α (p-PDH), which is involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). Immunohistochemical analyses using anti-HK2 and p-PDH antibodies were performed on surgically resected CRC samples (n = 104), and the expression in invasive front lesions of tumors was assessed. Positive HK2 expression correlated with extensive tumor diameter (P = 0.0460), advanced tumor depth (P = 0.0395), and presence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0409). Expression of p-PDH tended to be higher in right-sided CRCs than in left-sided CRCs (P = 0.0883). In survival analysis, the combined evaluation of positive HK2 and negative p-PDH was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.0169 in all stages and P = 0.0238 in Stage II and III patients, respectively). This evaluation could predict RFS more precisely than the independent evaluation. The present study indicated that high HK2 expression combined with low p-PDH expression in the invasive front lesions of CRC tumors is predictive of tumor aggressiveness and survival of CRC cases.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; hexokinase; invasion; metastasis; pyruvate dehydrogenase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25060325 PMCID: PMC4462394 DOI: 10.1111/cas.12487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Sci ISSN: 1347-9032 Impact factor: 6.716
Fig 1Immunohistochemical analysis of HK2 and p-PDH in clinical colorectal cancer samples. (a) Phosphate buffered saline was used as a negative control and a case of pancreatic cancer tissue was used as a positive control for HK2. (b) Staining of HK2 and (c) p-PDH at the invasive front are shown; the intensity was rated in three stages. Scale bar, 200 μm.
HK 2 expression and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer
| Hexokinase 2 | Positive ( | Negative ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient background | |||
| Gender (Male/Female) | 37/24 | 28/15 | 0.6436 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 63.2 ± 12.4 | 66.6 ± 10.6 | 0.9265 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.2 (20.5, 26.1) | 22.4 (20.3, 25.2) | 0.9579 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 3 (2, 9) | 3 (1, 5) | 0.5232 |
| CA19-9 (U/mL) | 11 (7, 21) | 13 (5, 22) | 0.8013 |
| Tumor characteristics | |||
| Tumor diameter (mm) | 40 (25, 54) | 30 (20, 44) | 0.0460 |
| Location | |||
| C/A/T | 5/10/7 | 3/5/7 | 0.9013 |
| D/S/R | 2/13/24 | 2/7/19 | |
| Tumor type | |||
| Type 0 | 13 | 13 | 0.3008 |
| Type 1/2/3/4/5 | 3/32/12/0/1 | 3/22/4/0/1 | |
| Histological type | |||
| tub1/tub2/pap | 17/39/1 | 13/23/1 | 0.3118 |
| por/muc | 0/4 | 4/2 | |
| Depth | |||
| T0/T1/T2 | 5/5/13 | 3/10/12 | 0.0395 |
| T3/T4 | 31/7 | 15/3 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 35 | 33 | 0.0409 |
| N1/N2/N3 | 16/7/3 | 7/0/3 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 53 | 40 | 0.5190 |
| M1 | 8 | 3 | |
| Lymphatic duct invasion | |||
| ly0 | 15 | 19 | 0.2321 |
| ly1/ly2 | 34/12 | 21/3 | |
| Venous invasion | |||
| v0 | 48 | 36 | 0.6176 |
| v1/v2 | 9/4 | 7/0 | |
| Stage | |||
| 0/I/II | 5/13/15 | 3/20/9 | 0.0350 |
| IIIa/IIIb/IV | 13/7/8 | 6/2/3 | |
Statistically significant. Data are presented as median (first quartile, third quartile). A, ascending colon; BMI, body mass index; C, cecum; D, descending colon; muc, mucinous carcinoma; pap, papillary adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; R, rectum; S, sigmoid colon; T, transverse colon; tub1, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; tub2, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.
p-PDH expression and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer
| Phospho-PDH-E1α | Positive ( | Negative ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient background | |||
| Gender (Male/Female) | 22/12 | 43/27 | 0.7461 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 66.0 ± 10.4 | 63.5 ± 13.3 | 0.1669 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.6 (20.6, 25.6) | 21.9 (20.3, 25.6) | 0.4316 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 2.5 (1, 6) | 3 (2.0, 7.3) | 0.4401 |
| CA19-9 (U/mL) | 12.5 (5.0, 23.3) | 12.5 (7.0, 21.3) | 0.8538 |
| Tumor characteristics | |||
| Tumor diameter (mm) | 37 (22, 52) | 35 (22, 52) | 0.6126 |
| Location | |||
| C/A/T | 5/6/5 | 3/9/9 | 0.0883 |
| D/S/R | 3/3/12 | 1/17/31 | |
| Tumor type | |||
| Type 0 | 11 | 15 | 0.2275 |
| Type 1/2/3/4/5 | 1/16/4/0/2 | 5/38/12/0/0 | |
| Histological type | |||
| tub1/tub2/pap | 10/18/1 | 20/44/1 | 0.2893 |
| por/muc | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Depth | |||
| T0/T1/T2 | 3/4/7 | 5/11/18 | 0.4779 |
| T3/T4 | 16/4 | 30/6 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 23 | 45 | 0.7354 |
| N1/N2/N3 | 5/4/2 | 18/3/4 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 29 | 64 | 0.3339 |
| M1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Lymphatic duct invasion | |||
| ly0 | 12 | 22 | 0.6857 |
| ly1/ly2 | 15/7 | 40/8 | |
| Venous invasion | |||
| v0 | 26 | 58 | 0.4394 |
| v1/v2 | 7/1 | 9/3 | |
| Stage | |||
| 0/I/II | 3/9/10 | 5/24/14 | 0.7461 |
| IIIa/IIIb/IV | 4/3/5 | 15/6/6 | |
Data are presented as median (first quartile, third quartile). A, ascending colon; BMI, body mass index; C, cecum; D, descending colon; muc, mucinous carcinoma; pap, papillary adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; R, rectum; S, sigmoid colon; T, transverse colon; tub1, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; tub2, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.
Fig 2Immunohistochemical analysis of PDH-E1α. Representative images of PDH-E1α staining in p-PDH negative cases (case 1 and 2) and p-PDH positive cases (cases 3 and 4). Scale bar, 100 μm.
Correlation between the immunohistochemical staining of phosphorylation status of PDH-E1α
| p-PDH |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Total PDH-E1α | |||
| Positive | 6 | 8 | 1.0000 |
| Negative | 2 | 3 | |
Assessment of the staining heterogeneity of HK2 and p-PDH in tumor superficial and deep part and in normal mucosa
| HK2 staining in deep part |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| HK2 staining in superficial part | |||
| Positive | 30 | 10 | 0.0074 |
| Negative | 31 | 33 | |
| HK2 staining in normal mucosa | |||
| Positive | 1 | 1 | 1.0000 |
| Negative | 54 | 38 | |
Statistically significant. In the assessment of staining in normal mucosa, the cases that did not contain normal mucosa in paraffin section were not included.
Fig 3Recurrence-free survival curves of the analyzed patients. (a) Patients in all stages were analyzed based on the level of HK2 expression. (b) Patients in all stages were analyzed based on the level of p-PDH expression. (c) Patients in all stages were analyzed based on combined expression of HK2 and p-PDH. (d) Patients in stage II and III were analyzed based on the level of HK2 expression. (e) Patients in stage II and III were analyzed based on the level of p-PDH expression. (f) Patients in stage II and III were analyzed based on combined expression of HK2 and p-PDH. *Statistically significant.
Results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for Stage 0–IV patients
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age | 1.017 (0.977–1.063) | 0.4066 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Female | Reference | 0.0120 | ||
| Male | 3.015 (1.004–12.963) | 0.0491 | 4.186 (1.365–18.220) | |
| Tumor diameter | 1.014 (0.994–1.032) | 0.1515 | ||
| Location | ||||
| Right-sided | Reference | 0.2371 | ||
| Left-sided | 1.806 (0.691–5.588) | |||
| Tumor type | ||||
| Type 0 | Reference | 0.0062 | ||
| Type 1/2/3/4/5 | 7.787 (1.608–140.039) | |||
| Histological type | ||||
| tub1/tub2/pap | Reference | 0.5763 | ||
| por/muc | 1.557 (0.247–5.434) | |||
| Depth | ||||
| T0/T1/T2 | Reference | 0.0028 | 0.0162 | |
| T3/T4 | 4.497 (1.631–15.781) | 3.695 (1.257–13.500) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| N0 | Reference | 0.0009 | 0.0190 | |
| N1/N2/N3 | 4.716 (1.892–12.704) | 3.156 (1.207–8.912) | ||
| Immunohistochemistry | ||||
| Others | Reference | 0.0198 | 0.0656 | |
| HK2+ and p-PDH- | 2.952 (1.187–7.933) | 2.383 (0.946–6.475) | ||
Statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Results of immunohistochemistry for Stage II and III cases based on HK2 and p-PDH expression
| HK2 expression | ||
|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |
| p-PDH expression | ||
| Positive | 10 | 6 |
| Negative | 25 | 11 |
Results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for Stage II and III patients
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age | 1.026 (0.976–1.077) | 0.3052 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Female | Reference | 0.0166 | 0.0270 | |
| Male | 4.657 (1.284–29.806) | 4.740 (1.175–32.086) | ||
| Tumor diameter | 1.011 (0.989–1.030) | 0.3140 | ||
| Location | ||||
| Right-sided | Reference | 0.0974 | 0.9038 | |
| Left-sided | 2.496 (0.8526–9.011) | 0.923 (0.270–3.821) | ||
| Histological type | ||||
| tub1/tub2/pap | Reference | 0.8206 | ||
| por/muc | 1.193 (0.186–4.321) | |||
| Depth | ||||
| T0/T1/T2 | Reference | 0.3387 | ||
| T3/T4 | 2.390 (0.4803–43.287) | |||
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| N0 | Reference | 0.0813 | 0.1745 | |
| N1/N2/N3 | 2.616 (0.892–9.458) | 2.284 (0.705–8.957) | ||
| Immunohistochemistry | ||||
| Others | Reference | 0.0230 | 0.0389 | |
| HK2+ and p-PDH- | 3.451 (1.179–12.463) | 3.143 (1.058–11.461) | ||
Statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Fig 4The budding count in colorectal cancer tissues. The budding count of HK2+ and p-PDH- cancers was significantly greater than that of the others (P = 0.0199). *Statistically significant.
Fig 5Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) accompanies HK2 upregulation and p-PDH downregulation. (a) Photomicrographs of the morphological change of SW480 cells. (b) Western blot assays of E-cadherin, Vimentin, HK2, p-PDH, and ACTB expression in pre-EMT and post-EMT cells. Samples of post-EMT cells were harvested at 72 h. (c) Hexokinase activity in pre-EMT and post-EMT cells. Samples of post-EMT cells were harvested at 72 h. (d) Pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in pre-EMT and post-EMT cells. Samples of post-EMT cells were harvested at 72 h. (e) Relative transcript (mRNA) levels of HK2, PDK1, and PDP2 after inducing EMT for 0 and 48 h. The values at 0 h have been normalized to 1, and the data are expressed as fold. *Statistically significant.