Timothy A McGuine1, Scott Hetzel2, Michael McCrea3, M Alison Brooks4. 1. Department of Orthopedics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA tmcguine@uwhealth.org. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 3. Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of sport-related concussion (SRC) in high school football is well documented. However, limited prospective data are available regarding how player characteristics and protective equipment affect the incidence of SRC. PURPOSE: To determine whether the type of protective equipment (helmet and mouth guard) and player characteristics affect the incidence of SRC in high school football players. DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Certified athletic trainers (ATs) at each high school recorded the type of helmet worn (brand, model, purchase year, and recondition status) by each player as well as information regarding players' demographics, type of mouth guard used, and history of SRC. The ATs also recorded the incidence and days lost from participation for each SRC. Incidence of SRC was compared for various helmets, type of mouth guard, history of SRC, and player demographics. RESULTS: A total of 2081 players (grades 9-12) enrolled during the 2012 and/or 2013 football seasons (2287 player-seasons) and participated in 134,437 football (practice or competition) exposures. Of these players, 206 (9%) sustained a total of 211 SRCs (1.56/1000 exposures). There was no difference in the incidence of SRC (number of helmets, % SRC [95% CI]) for players wearing Riddell (1171, 9.1% [7.6%-11.0%]), Schutt (680, 8.7% [6.7%-11.1%]), or Xenith (436, 9.2% [6.7%-12.4%]) helmets. Helmet age and recondition status did not affect the incidence of SRC. The rate of SRC (hazard ratio [HR]) was higher in players who wore a custom mouth guard (HR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.20-2.37], P < .001) than in players who wore a generic mouth guard. The rate of SRC was also higher (HR = 1.96 [95% CI, 1.40-2.73], P < .001) in players who had sustained an SRC within the previous 12 months (15.1% of the 259 players [95% CI, 11.0%-20.1%]) than in players without a previous SRC (8.2% of the 2028 players [95% CI, 7.1%-9.5%]). CONCLUSION: Incidence of SRC was similar regardless of the helmet brand (manufacturer) worn by high school football players. Players who had sustained an SRC within the previous 12 months were more likely to sustain an SRC than were players without a history of SRC. Sports medicine providers who work with high school football players need to realize that factors other than the type of protective equipment worn affect the risk of SRC in high school players.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of sport-related concussion (SRC) in high school football is well documented. However, limited prospective data are available regarding how player characteristics and protective equipment affect the incidence of SRC. PURPOSE: To determine whether the type of protective equipment (helmet and mouth guard) and player characteristics affect the incidence of SRC in high school football players. DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Certified athletic trainers (ATs) at each high school recorded the type of helmet worn (brand, model, purchase year, and recondition status) by each player as well as information regarding players' demographics, type of mouth guard used, and history of SRC. The ATs also recorded the incidence and days lost from participation for each SRC. Incidence of SRC was compared for various helmets, type of mouth guard, history of SRC, and player demographics. RESULTS: A total of 2081 players (grades 9-12) enrolled during the 2012 and/or 2013 football seasons (2287 player-seasons) and participated in 134,437 football (practice or competition) exposures. Of these players, 206 (9%) sustained a total of 211 SRCs (1.56/1000 exposures). There was no difference in the incidence of SRC (number of helmets, % SRC [95% CI]) for players wearing Riddell (1171, 9.1% [7.6%-11.0%]), Schutt (680, 8.7% [6.7%-11.1%]), or Xenith (436, 9.2% [6.7%-12.4%]) helmets. Helmet age and recondition status did not affect the incidence of SRC. The rate of SRC (hazard ratio [HR]) was higher in players who wore a custom mouth guard (HR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.20-2.37], P < .001) than in players who wore a generic mouth guard. The rate of SRC was also higher (HR = 1.96 [95% CI, 1.40-2.73], P < .001) in players who had sustained an SRC within the previous 12 months (15.1% of the 259 players [95% CI, 11.0%-20.1%]) than in players without a previous SRC (8.2% of the 2028 players [95% CI, 7.1%-9.5%]). CONCLUSION: Incidence of SRC was similar regardless of the helmet brand (manufacturer) worn by high school football players. Players who had sustained an SRC within the previous 12 months were more likely to sustain an SRC than were players without a history of SRC. Sports medicine providers who work with high school football players need to realize that factors other than the type of protective equipment worn affect the risk of SRC in high school players.
Authors: Andrew E Lincoln; Shane V Caswell; Jon L Almquist; Reginald E Dunn; Joseph B Norris; Richard Y Hinton Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mark R Schulz; Stephen W Marshall; Frederick O Mueller; Jingzhen Yang; Nancy L Weaver; William D Kalsbeek; J Michael Bowling Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Paul McCrory; Willem Meeuwisse; Mark Aubry; Bob Cantu; Jiri Dvorak; Ruben J Echemendia; Lars Engebretsen; Karen Johnston; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Martin Raftery; Allen Sills; Brian W Benson; Gavin A Davis; Richard G Ellenbogen; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stanley A Herring; Grant Iverson; Barry D Jordan; James Kissick; Michael McCrea; Andrew S McIntosh; David L Maddocks; Michael Makdissi; Laura Purcell; Margot Putukian; Michael Turner; Kathryn Schneider; Charles H Tator Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Brian W Benson; Andrew S McIntosh; David Maddocks; Stanley A Herring; Martin Raftery; Jirí Dvorák Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Christopher C Giza; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Stephen Ashwal; Jeffrey Barth; Thomas S D Getchius; Gerard A Gioia; Gary S Gronseth; Kevin Guskiewicz; Steven Mandel; Geoffrey Manley; Douglas B McKeag; David J Thurman; Ross Zafonte Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Steven P Broglio; Douglas Martini; Luke Kasper; James T Eckner; Jeffery S Kutcher Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Kimberly G Harmon; Jonathan A Drezner; Matthew Gammons; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Mark Halstead; Stanley A Herring; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Andrea Pana; Margot Putukian; William O Roberts Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Scott L Zuckerman; Bryson B Reynolds; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Andrew W Kuhn; Jacob T Chadwell; Sarah E Goodale; Claire E Lafferty; Kyle T Langford; Lydia J McKeithan; Paul Kirby; Gary S Solomon Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Kathryn L Van Pelt; Tim Puetz; Jennylee Swallow; Andrew P Lapointe; Steven P Broglio Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Steven Rowson; Megan L Bland; Eamon T Campolettano; Jaclyn N Press; Bethany Rowson; Jake A Smith; David W Sproule; Abigail M Tyson; Stefan M Duma Journal: Sports Med Arthrosc Rev Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ann M Bailey; Timothy L McMurry; Joseph M Cormier; James R Funk; Jeff R Crandall; Christina D Mack; Barry S Myers; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Kathryn L O'Connor; Melissa M Baker; Sara L Dalton; Thomas P Dompier; Steven P Broglio; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Shawn R Eagle; Anthony P Kontos; Micky W Collins; Chris Connaboy; Shawn D Flanagan Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 2.860