Literature DB >> 25059912

A leader-follower relationship in joint action on a discrete force production task.

Junya Masumoto1, Nobuyuki Inui.   

Abstract

The present study examined the development of a leader-follower relationship in joint action performed by participants with different skill levels. Two participants were instructed to produce discrete isometric forces such that the sum of the forces was the target force. The task did not prescribe the onset time or share of force each participant contributed to the target force. Although novices with low force variability did not produce an earlier force than those with high force variability in the novice-novice group, experienced participants produced an earlier force than novices in the novice-experienced group. While participants with low force variability always produced a stronger force than those with high force variability in both the groups, there was no significant difference in force distributions between participants with low and high force variabilities. Although a novice-experienced pair produced force more complementarily than a novice-novice pair in the first practice block, the difference between pairs vanished after the first practice block, suggesting that leader-follower relations were not always beneficial to task performance. In addition, practice of the joint action did not transfer to individual action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059912     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Harold Bekkering; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Contextual determinants of the social-transfer-of-learning effect.

Authors:  Nadia Milanese; Cristina Iani; Natalie Sebanz; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.

Authors:  Nadia Milanese; Cristina Iani; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-08

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping.

Authors:  Ivana Konvalinka; Peter Vuust; Andreas Roepstorff; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing.

Authors:  Roger D Newman-Norlund; Jurjen Bosga; Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Erez Dekel; Uri Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Look what I am doing: does observational learning take place in evocative task-sharing situations?

Authors:  Luca Ferraro; Cristina Iani; Michele Mariani; Roberto Nicoletti; Vittorio Gallese; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Corrective jitter motion shows similar individual frequencies for the arm and the finger.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Uri Alon; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Bidirectional transfer between joint and individual actions in a task of discrete force production.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Taking two to tango: fMRI analysis of improvised joint action with physical contact.

Authors:  Léa A S Chauvigné; Michel Belyk; Steven Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.

Authors:  David R Painter; Jeffrey J Kim; Angela I Renton; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 7.  Let's Move It Together: A Review of Group Benefits in Joint Object Control.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; April Karlinsky; Laura Schmitz; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-07

8.  Incomplete information about the partner affects the development of collaborative strategies in joint action.

Authors:  Vinil T Chackochan; Vittorio Sanguineti
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.