Literature DB >> 25059839

Thermal imaging evaluation of paravertebral block for mastectomy in high risk patient: case report.

Marcin Możański1, Bartosz Rustecki, Bolesław Kalicki, Anna Jung.   

Abstract

Thoracic paravertebral block is the technique of injecting local anesthetic adjacent to the thoracic vertebra close to where the spinal nerves emerge from the intervertebral foramina. It is effective in treating acute and chronic pain of unilateral origin from the chest and abdomen. This technique causes pain relief with pulmonary function preservation and great hemodynamic stability. 66 year old woman (156 cm, 80 kg, BMI 32) with chronic right heart failure, hypertension and obesity, on chronic oxygen therapy was presented for elective mastectomy due to breast cancer. She suffered from severe COPD and also bullous emphysema. FVC 1.59 l; FEV1 0.55 l; FEV1%FVC 34.6. The paravertebral block was performed using the multi-shot percutaneous technique with additional light general anesthesia. For confirmation, of proper analgesia range, control of temperature changes, using FLIR i7 infrared camera, was performed. Control photos were made 20 min after the blockade and then 10 min later. Infrared photo showed rise of temperature reading in every marked region. There were no hemodynamic and pulmonary complications postoperatively. Paravertebral block in combination with sedation creates excellent conditions for breast surgery procedures. Additional temperature changes monitoring performed with infrared camera may confirm proper range of analgesia needed to perform surgery. Great cardiovascular stability and very good pulmonary function preservation make this method excellent for high risk patients. Low complication rate is additional advantage. In our opinion this method is recommendable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059839      PMCID: PMC4412829          DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9599-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


Paravertebral block basics

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a technique of injecting local anesthetic adjacent to the thoracic vertebra close to where the spinal nerves emerge from the intervertebral foramina. This results in ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic nerve blockade in multiple contiguous thoracic dermatomes above and below the site of injection [1, 2]. It is effective in treating acute and chronic pain of unilateral origin from the chest and abdomen [3-5]. TPVB is an old method of regional analgesia that was first described in the beginning of last century. In 1905 Hugo Sellheim from Leipzig described anatomical space lying alongside vertebral column. Following this discovery Sellheim and Lawen decided to inject small doses of local anesthetics into this space and to observe the effects [1]. This technique causes very good pain relief effect and also excellent pulmonary function preservation as well as great hemodynamic stability [6-8]. There is a short list of adverse effects and possible complications. Hypotension—4.6 %; Vascular puncture—3.8 %; Pleural puncture—1.1 % Pneumothorax—0.5 %. Coagulation disorders are rather relative contraindications for this technique [9]. At the Department of General, Oncological, Metabolical and Thoracosurgery first paravertebral block was performed in 2000 for analgesia of multiple rib fractures. Since then we performed a lot of PVBs mostly for breast surgery and thoracosurgery with very good analgesic effect and great preservation of pulmonary function.

Case

66 year old woman (156 cm, 80 kg, BMI 32) presented for elective mastectomy due to breast cancer. She suffered from severe COPD and also bullous emphysema. FVC 1.59 l; FEV1 0.55 l; FEV1 %FVC 34.6. She was on home oxygen therapy. Chronic right heart failure, hypertension and obesity were the other problems. The paravertebral block was performed using the multi-shot percutaneous technique at Th3, Th4, Th5 and Th6. We used 22 ml of 0.75 % ropivakaine with 0.2 mg of fentanyl. For confirmation, of proper analgesia range, control of temperature changes, using infrared camera was performed. Then light general anesthesia with laryngeal mask (LMA) and sevoflurane was performed. Infrared photo were made from around 0.5 m distance with FLIR i7 camera, with preservation of proper standards [10]. Patient was uncovered while performing the exam. First picture was made before performing of paravertebral blockade procedure. Paravertebral multi-shot procedure took 6 min to perform. First control photo was made 20 min after the blockade and next 10 min after. Temperature average was marked for chosen representative area for every segment needed to be anesthetized to perform planed surgery. For every marked area we observed rise in temperature reading from infrared camera photo, which was indirect confirmation of proper paravertebral blockade. Data shown in Table 1, Fig. 1.
Table 1

Results from average infrared photo temperature reading

Marked segmentTime 0Δ Time 0 to +20Time + 20Δ Time +20 to +30Time + 30
seg Th233.11.334.41.135.5
seg Th2–334.11.135.20.135.3
seg Th3–433.31.234.5034.5
seg Th432.60.833.41.434.8
seg Th533.20.733.90.434.3
Fig. 1

Temperature changes in check points. 1—before blockade, 2—20 min after blockade, 3—30 min after blockade

Results from average infrared photo temperature reading Temperature changes in check points. 1—before blockade, 2—20 min after blockade, 3—30 min after blockade Similar method of confirmation was previously used in S.P.S Cheema study of paravertebral analgesia. They have received confirmation of proper range of analgesia corresponding to ipsilateral temperature changes marked in infrared technique in six patients. Thus different level of paravertebral block was used in that study [11]. Infrared photo showed rise of temperature count in every marked region after 20 min from injection. Latter infrared temperature reading also showed further increase of marked temperature confirming sympathetic nervous system blockade and indirectly proper range of analgesia. Example infrared pictures are in Figs. 2 and 3.
Fig. 2

Infrared photo made before paravertebral blockade

Fig. 3

Infrared photo made 30 min after paravertebral blockade

Infrared photo made before paravertebral blockade Infrared photo made 30 min after paravertebral blockade The patient received very good intraoperative analgesia with high cardiovascular stability and very good respiratory function preservation. There were no hemodynamic and pulmonary complications postoperatively.

Conclusion

Paravertebral block in combination with sedation creates excellent conditions for breast surgery procedures. Additional temperature changes monitoring performed with infrared camera may confirm proper range of analgesia needed to perform surgery. Great cardiovascular stability and very good pulmonary function preservation make this method excellent for high risk patients. Low complication rate is additional advantage. In our opinion this method is recommendable.
  10 in total

1.  Post-thoracotomy epidural vs paravertebral analgesia.

Authors:  J Y Wang
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Complications of paravertebral block.

Authors:  S S Wyatt; R A Price
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Thoracic paravertebral block.

Authors:  M K Karmakar
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Pre-emptive analgesia with thoracic paravertebral blockade?

Authors:  P-A Lönnqvist
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Thoracic paravertebral block: a method of pain control.

Authors:  J Gilbert; J Hultman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Thoracic paravertebral block in chronic postoperative pain.

Authors:  M Ferrandiz; L Aliaga; E Catala; J M Villar-Landeira
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1994 May-Jun

7.  Thoracic paravertebral block for management of pain associated with multiple fractured ribs in patients with concomitant lumbar spinal trauma.

Authors:  M K Karmakar; P T Chui; G M Joynt; A M Ho
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 8.  Post-thoracotomy spirometric lung function: the effect of analgesia. A review.

Authors:  J Richardson; S Sabanathan; R Shah
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.888

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A Schnabel; S U Reichl; P Kranke; E M Pogatzki-Zahn; P K Zahn
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A thermographic study of paravertebral analgesia.

Authors:  S P Cheema; D Ilsley; J Richardson; S Sabanathan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.955

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Thermal camera as a pain monitor.

Authors:  Varlik K Erel; Heval Selman Özkan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.133

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.