Literature DB >> 25059816

Experience and learning curve of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Hakan Ercil1, Adem Altunkol2, Faruk Kuyucu1, Nevzat Can Sener1, Ediz Vuruskan1, Ferhat Ortoglu1, Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate clinical experience and learning curve associated with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy performed for upper ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical data of 50 patients who had undergone retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy between June 2010 and March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. To assess the learning curve, patients were divided into two groups: Group A (the first 25 cases) and Group B (the last 25 cases). In Group A, double J stents were placed in 17 patients, whereas in Group B 15 patients received double J stents. In Group A, three ports were placed in nine patients and four ports in 16 patients. In Group B, three ports were placed in 20 patients and five patients had four ports. The patients were compared according to demographics, operative time, stone size, complications, hospital stay, and transfusion.
RESULTS: The mean age for Group A was 47.8 ± 14.13 (21-72) years and that for Group B was 44.2 ± 14.98 (22-78) years. Mean operative times were 106.4 ± 38 (55-210) minutes and 70.76 ± 30.4 (30-180) minutes for Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean hospital stay was 7.12 ± 4.47 (3-22) days and 4.04 ± 2.05 (2-12) days for Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean stone size was 20.12 ± 5.18 (12-30) mm and 19.44 ± 4.44 (13-28) mm for Groups A and B, respectively (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In our study, as staff experience (in performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy) increased, operative time, length of hospital stay, and complication rates have correspondingly declined.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calculi; laparoscopy; ureter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059816     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil; Rabea Omar; Shabieb Abdel-Baky; Ahmed Mohey; Ahmed Sebaey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi (report of 206 cases followed for 10 years).

Authors:  Keyi Wang; Guangchun Wang; Heng Shi; Haimin Zhang; Jianhua Huang; Jiang Geng; Lei Yin; Tianrun Huang; Bo Peng
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Using retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted upper ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Bo Jia; Jiayuan Liu; Bo Hu; Zhaohui Chen
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.