Literature DB >> 25059727

The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.

Kwan-Woong Choi1, Jeong-Rim Lee, Jung-Tak Oh, Dong Wook Kim, Min-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An intracuff pressure of 80 cm H2 O in the adult-sized laryngeal mask airway Supreme has been recommended to obtain a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). However, the intracuff pressure for the higher OLP in the pediatric laryngeal mask airway Supreme could be different from that in the adult-sized laryngeal mask airway Supreme. Thus, we measured and compared OLP at three intracuff pressures of 40, 60, and 80 cm H2 O in the pediatric laryngeal mask airway Supreme.
METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized crossover study and enrolled 36 children, aged 0-108 months and 5-30 kg in weight. After insertion of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) was measured at intracuff pressures of 40, 60, and 80 cm H2 O according to one of six sequences produced on the basis of 3 × 6 Williams crossover design. During the intraoperative period, the laryngeal mask airway Supreme was maintained using the last intracuff pressure of the allocated sequence. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared among three maintenance intracuff pressures.
RESULTS: OLP at the intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2 O was significantly higher than that of 40 cm H2 O (17.9 ± 3.9 vs 16.9 ± 4.2 cm H2 O, P = 0.004) and was comparable with that of 80 cm H2 O (17.9 ± 3.9 vs 17.8 ± 4.6 cm H2 O, P = 0.938). There were no significant differences of intraoperative and postoperative complications among the three maintenance intracuff pressures.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the use of an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2 O in pediatric laryngeal mask airway Supreme provides a higher OLP compared with 40 cm H2 O.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; anesthesia; clinical trial; laryngeal mask airway; pediatrics; sore throat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059727     DOI: 10.1111/pan.12494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  4 in total

1.  Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Li; Jie Yan; Hong-Gang Zhou; Jing Hao; Ai-Jia Liu; Zheng-Liang Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.

Authors:  Yoon Chan Lee; Kyoung Seop Yoon; Sang Yoong Park; So Ron Choi; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-08-14

4.  Evaluation of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures Using Supreme™ Airway Laryngeal Mask during Minor Surgical Procedures in Children.

Authors:  Mascha O Fiedler; Elisabeth Schätzle; Marius Contzen; Christian Gernoth; Christel Weiß; Thomas Walter; Tim Viergutz; Armin Kalenka
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.