Literature DB >> 25059224

Electronic health records and resident workflow: a time-motion study of otolaryngology residents.

Andrew J Victores1, Kenneth Coggins, Mas Takashima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the impact of electronic health records (EHRs) on the workflow of otolaryngology residents. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, time-motion study.
METHODS: A time-motion study was conducted both in the 2009 to 2010 and 2012 to 2013 postgraduate years. Eight otolaryngology residents were directly observed on both operative and clinic days, with resident activities categorized by way of a database program. Comparisons were made to the same data collected in the same setting prior to and following integration of an EHR system.
RESULTS: Residents spent their day on direct patient care (41.1%), indirect patient care (35.3%), didactic education (14.0%), personal activities (6.9%), and transit (3.1%). The primary activity during operative days was direct patient care, and during clinic days it was indirect patient care. Activities of marginal educational value comprised a considerable component of their time (16.5%). Compared to data collected prior to use of an EHR, time was spent similarly. However, residents using an EHR devoted significantly more time to indirect patient care on clinic days (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate EHR integration on otolaryngology resident workflow. Overall resident efficiency was not significantly altered by the implementation of an EHR. However, more time was shifted from directly caring for patients to documenting on the EHR in the clinic setting. These findings provide an important objective insight into EHRs, especially given the looming mandate for their use and the need to streamline resident curriculum in the duty hours era.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health record; efficiency; resident workflow; time-motion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059224     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  13 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of the Literature on Unintended Consequences Associated with Health Information Technology: 2014-2015.

Authors:  K Zheng; J Abraham; L L Novak; T L Reynolds; A Gettinger
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

2.  Use of Electronic Health Record Simulation to Understand the Accuracy of Intern Progress Notes.

Authors:  Christopher A March; Gretchen Scholl; Renee K Dversdal; Matthew Richards; Leah M Wilson; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

3.  Racing Against the Clock: Internal Medicine Residents' Time Spent On Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Uta Guo; Lijo C Illipparambil; Matt D Netherton; Bhairavi Sheshadri; Eric Karu; Stephen J Peterson; Parag H Mehta
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-02

4.  A Mobile, Collaborative, Real Time Task List for Inpatient Environments.

Authors:  K A Michelson; T Ho; A Pelletier; S Al Ayubi; F Bourgeois
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Better Usability and Technical Stability Could Lead to Better Work-Related Well-Being among Physicians.

Authors:  Suvi Vainiomäki; Anna-Mari Aalto; Tinja Lääveri; Timo Sinervo; Marko Elovainio; Pekka Mäntyselkä; Hannele Hyppönen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical workflow analysis.

Authors:  Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Isaac H Goldstein; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Interaction Time with Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yuliya Pinevich; Kathryn J Clark; Andrew M Harrison; Brian W Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Why Residency Programs Should Not Ignore the Electronic Heath Record after Adoption.

Authors:  Conrad Krawiec
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-10-01

9.  Impact of Electronic Health Record Implementation on Ophthalmology Trainee Time Expenditures.

Authors:  Helena E Gali; Sally L Baxter; Lina Lander; Abigail E Huang; Marlene Millen; Robert El-Kareh; Eric Nudleman; Daniel L Chao; Shira L Robbins; Christopher W D Heichel; Andrew S Camp; Bobby S Korn; Jeffrey E Lee; Don O Kikkawa; Christopher A Longhurst; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Acad Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07

10.  Finnish physicians' stress related to information systems keeps increasing: a longitudinal three-wave survey study.

Authors:  Tarja Heponiemi; Hannele Hyppönen; Tuulikki Vehko; Sari Kujala; Anna-Mari Aalto; Jukka Vänskä; Marko Elovainio
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.