Literature DB >> 25058287

Rethinking niche evolution: experiments with natural communities of Protozoa in pitcher plants.

Thomas E Miller1, Emma R Moran, Casey P terHorst.   

Abstract

Classic niche theory predicts that competing species will evolve to use different resources and interact less, whereas recent niche-converge ideas predict that species evolve to use similar resources and interact more. Most data supporting niche evolution are based on observations of contemporary niche use, whereas experimental support is quite sparse. We followed the evolution of four species of Protozoa during succession in the water-filled leaves of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea, and found that evolution in multispecies systems follows a surprising pattern. Over several hundred generations, weak competitors evolved to be stronger, while strong competitors evolved to become weaker, which does not conform to expectations of either niche divergence or convergence. Evolution in this system appears to occur in response to characteristics of a suite of several competitors in the community, rather than pairwise interactions. Ecologists may need to rethink the roles of competition and evolution in structuring communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058287     DOI: 10.1086/676943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  3 in total

1.  Priority effects are weakened by a short, but not long, history of sympatric evolution.

Authors:  Peter C Zee; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The evolution of niche overlap and competitive differences.

Authors:  Abigail I Pastore; György Barabás; Malyon D Bimler; Margaret M Mayfield; Thomas E Miller
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Effects of a ciliate protozoa predator on microbial communities in pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) leaves.

Authors:  Taylor K Paisie; Thomas E Miller; Olivia U Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.