Literature DB >> 25058196

Gender-specific genital and subjective sexual arousal to prepotent sexual features in heterosexual women and men.

Jessica Spape1, Amanda D Timmers1, Samuel Yoon1, Jorge Ponseti2, Meredith L Chivers3.   

Abstract

Heterosexual women respond genitally to stimuli featuring both their preferred and nonpreferred genders, whereas men's genital responses are gender-specific, suggesting that gender cues are less relevant to women's sexual response. Instead, prepotent sexual features (exposed and sexually aroused genitals), ubiquitous in audiovisual sexual stimuli, may elicit automatic genital responses, thereby leading to a nonspecific sexual arousal pattern in women. To examine the role of stimulus potency in women's sexual response, we assessed heterosexual women's and men's genital and subjective sexual arousal to slideshows of prepotent stimuli (erect penises and aroused vulvas), non-prepotent stimuli (flaccid penises and female pubic triangles), and sexually neutral stimuli. Contrary to our hypotheses, both women and men demonstrated gender-specific genital and subjective sexual arousal, such that sexual arousal was greatest to prepotent male and female stimuli, respectively. This is the first study to demonstrate gender-specific genital responding in heterosexual women.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female; Gender; Genital sexual arousal; Heterosexual; Male; Psychophysiology; Sexual arousal; Sexual response; Specificity of sexual arousal; Subjective sexual arousal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058196     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  9 in total

1.  Conceptualizing Neural Responses to Sexual Stimuli.

Authors:  Jackie S Huberman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 2.  A neural circuit encoding sexual preference in humans.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Straight but Not Narrow; Within-Gender Variation in the Gender-Specificity of Women's Sexual Response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Katrina N Bouchard; Amanda D Timmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gender-Specificity of Initial and Controlled Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Androphilic Women and Gynephilic Men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Hierarchical Model Might Cast Some Light on the Anomaly.

Authors:  Frederick Toates
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Neural Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Women.

Authors:  Adam Safron; Victoria Klimaj; David Sylva; A M Rosenthal; Meng Li; Martin Walter; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Understanding heterosexual women's erotic flexibility: the role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Janna A Dickenson; Lisa Diamond; Jace B King; Kay Jenson; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.