Literature DB >> 25058085

Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery.

Mark D Neuman1, Paul R Rosenbaum2, Justin M Ludwig3, Jose R Zubizarreta4, Jeffrey H Silber5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: More than 300,000 hip fractures occur each year in the United States. Recent practice guidelines have advocated greater use of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To test the association of regional (ie, spinal or epidural) anesthesia vs general anesthesia with 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay after hip fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study involving patients 50 years or older who were undergoing surgery for hip fracture at general acute care hospitals in New York State between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. Our main analysis was a near-far instrumental variable match that paired patients who lived at different distances from hospitals that specialized in regional or general anesthesia. Supplementary analyses included a within-hospital match that paired patients within the same hospital and an across-hospital match that paired patients at different hospitals. EXPOSURES: Spinal or epidural anesthesia; general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality and hospital length of stay. Because the distribution of length of stay had long tails, we characterized this outcome using the Huber M estimate with Huber weights, a robust estimator similar to a trimmed mean.
RESULTS: Of 56,729 patients, 15,904 (28%) received regional anesthesia and 40,825 (72%) received general anesthesia. Overall, 3032 patients (5.3%) died. The M estimate of the length of stay was 6.2 days (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.2). The near-far matched analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day mortality by anesthesia type among the 21,514 patients included in this match: 583 of 10,757 matched patients (5.4%) who lived near a regional anesthesia-specialized hospital died vs 629 of 10,757 matched patients (5.8%) who lived near a general anesthesia-specialized hospital (instrumental variable estimate of risk difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -2.8 to 0.5; P = .20). Supplementary analyses of within and across hospital patient matches yielded mortality findings to be similar to the main analysis. In the near-far match, regional anesthesia was associated with a 0.6-day shorter length of stay than general anesthesia (95% CI, -0.8 to -0.4, P < .001). Supplementary analyses also showed regional anesthesia to be associated with shorter length of stay, although the observed association was smaller in magnitude than in the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults in acute care hospitals in New York State undergoing hip repair, the use of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia was not associated with lower 30-day mortality but was associated with a modestly shorter length of stay. These findings do not support a mortality benefit for regional anesthesia in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058085      PMCID: PMC4344128          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.6499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  30 in total

1.  Predisposing factors for postoperative delirium after hip fracture repair in individuals with and without dementia.

Authors:  Hochang B Lee; Simon C Mears; Paul B Rosenberg; Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Allan Gottschalk; Frederick E Sieber
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.

Authors:  Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function.

Authors:  J Magaziner; W Hawkes; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; K M Fox; M Dolan; G Felsenthal; J Kenzora
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Improving hip fractures outcomes for COPD patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Regan; Tiffany A Radcliff; William G Henderson; Diane C Cowper Ripley; Matthew L Maciejewski; W Bruce Vogel; Evelyn Hutt
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Jeffrey H Silber; Nabil M Elkassabany; Justin M Ludwig; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after hip fracture surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicolai Bang Foss; Morten Tange Kristensen; Billy Bjarne Kristensen; Pia Søe Jensen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition).

Authors:  Terese T Horlocker; Denise J Wedel; John C Rowlingson; F Kayser Enneking; Sandra L Kopp; Honorio T Benzon; David L Brown; John A Heit; Michael F Mulroy; Richard W Rosenquist; Michael Tryba; Chun-Su Yuan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

8.  Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture.

Authors:  Tiffany A Radcliff; William G Henderson; Tamara J Stoner; Shukri F Khuri; Michael Dohm; Evelyn Hutt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Taylor S Riall; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; James S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Postoperative confusion after anesthesia in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  D Berggren; Y Gustafson; B Eriksson; G Bucht; L I Hansson; S Reiz; B Winblad
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  80 in total

1.  Understanding outcomes after neuraxial anaesthesia: time to turn the page.

Authors:  M D Neuman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults.

Authors:  S Murthy; D L Hepner; Z Cooper; A M Bader; M D Neuman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  [Anesthesiological management of elderly trauma patients].

Authors:  M Coburn; A B Röhl; M Knobe; A Stevanovic; C Stoppe; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for elderly patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Dan Gottlieb; Yin Su; Alistair J O'Malley; Nicos Labropoulos; Phillip Goodney; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Large, Sparse Optimal Matching with Refined Covariate Balance in an Observational Study of the Health Outcomes Produced by New Surgeons.

Authors:  Samuel D Pimentel; Rachel R Kelz; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  The relationship between historical risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and subsequent hip fracture outcomes: Retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Molly R Passarella; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-10-30

7.  The association of female sex with application of evidence-based practice recommendations for perioperative care in hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Natalie Cho; Laura Boland; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Neuraxial block and postoperative epidural analgesia: effects on outcomes in the POISE-2 trial†.

Authors:  K Leslie; D McIlroy; J Kasza; A Forbes; A Kurz; J Khan; C S Meyhoff; R Allard; G Landoni; X Jara; G Lurati Buse; K Candiotti; H-S Lee; R Gupta; T VanHelder; W Purayil; S De Hert; T Treschan; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Statistics in Brief: Instrumental Variable Analysis: An Underutilized Method in Orthopaedic Research.

Authors:  Hsin-Hui Huang; Paul J Cagle; Madhu Mazumdar; Jashvant Poeran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  [Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Carl Neuerburg; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.