Literature DB >> 25057982

8.2% of the Human genome is constrained: variation in rates of turnover across functional element classes in the human lineage.

Chris M Rands1, Stephen Meader1, Chris P Ponting1, Gerton Lunter2.   

Abstract

Ten years on from the finishing of the human reference genome sequence, it remains unclear what fraction of the human genome confers function, where this sequence resides, and how much is shared with other mammalian species. When addressing these questions, functional sequence has often been equated with pan-mammalian conserved sequence. However, functional elements that are short-lived, including those contributing to species-specific biology, will not leave a footprint of long-lasting negative selection. Here, we address these issues by identifying and characterising sequence that has been constrained with respect to insertions and deletions for pairs of eutherian genomes over a range of divergences. Within noncoding sequence, we find increasing amounts of mutually constrained sequence as species pairs become more closely related, indicating that noncoding constrained sequence turns over rapidly. We estimate that half of present-day noncoding constrained sequence has been gained or lost in approximately the last 130 million years (half-life in units of divergence time, d1/2 = 0.25-0.31). While enriched with ENCODE biochemical annotations, much of the short-lived constrained sequences we identify are not detected by models optimized for wider pan-mammalian conservation. Constrained DNase 1 hypersensitivity sites, promoters and untranslated regions have been more evolutionarily stable than long noncoding RNA loci which have turned over especially rapidly. By contrast, protein coding sequence has been highly stable, with an estimated half-life of over a billion years (d1/2 = 2.1-5.0). From extrapolations we estimate that 8.2% (7.1-9.2%) of the human genome is presently subject to negative selection and thus is likely to be functional, while only 2.2% has maintained constraint in both human and mouse since these species diverged. These results reveal that the evolutionary history of the human genome has been highly dynamic, particularly for its noncoding yet biologically functional fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25057982      PMCID: PMC4109858          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


  45 in total

1.  Comparative analyses of multi-species sequences from targeted genomic regions.

Authors:  J W Thomas; J W Touchman; R W Blakesley; G G Bouffard; S M Beckstrom-Sternberg; E H Margulies; M Blanchette; A C Siepel; P J Thomas; J C McDowell; B Maskeri; N F Hansen; M S Schwartz; R J Weber; W J Kent; D Karolchik; T C Bruen; R Bevan; D J Cutler; S Schwartz; L Elnitski; J R Idol; A B Prasad; S-Q Lee-Lin; V V B Maduro; T J Summers; M E Portnoy; N L Dietrich; N Akhter; K Ayele; B Benjamin; K Cariaga; C P Brinkley; S Y Brooks; S Granite; X Guan; J Gupta; P Haghighi; S-L Ho; M C Huang; E Karlins; P L Laric; R Legaspi; M J Lim; Q L Maduro; C A Masiello; S D Mastrian; J C McCloskey; R Pearson; S Stantripop; E E Tiongson; J T Tran; C Tsurgeon; J L Vogt; M A Walker; K D Wetherby; L S Wiggins; A C Young; L-H Zhang; K Osoegawa; B Zhu; B Zhao; C L Shu; P J De Jong; C E Lawrence; A F Smit; A Chakravarti; D Haussler; P Green; W Miller; E D Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evolution's cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes.

Authors:  W James Kent; Robert Baertsch; Angie Hinrichs; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs.

Authors:  David Brawand; Magali Soumillon; Anamaria Necsulea; Philippe Julien; Gábor Csárdi; Patrick Harrigan; Manuela Weier; Angélica Liechti; Ayinuer Aximu-Petri; Martin Kircher; Frank W Albert; Ulrich Zeller; Philipp Khaitovich; Frank Grützner; Sven Bergmann; Rasmus Nielsen; Svante Pääbo; Henrik Kaessmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex loci.

Authors:  N Takahata; Y Satta; J Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes.

Authors:  Adam Siepel; Gill Bejerano; Jakob S Pedersen; Angie S Hinrichs; Minmei Hou; Kate Rosenbloom; Hiram Clawson; John Spieth; Ladeana W Hillier; Stephen Richards; George M Weinstock; Richard K Wilson; Richard A Gibbs; W James Kent; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Three periods of regulatory innovation during vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  Craig B Lowe; Manolis Kellis; Adam Siepel; Brian J Raney; Michele Clamp; Sofie R Salama; David M Kingsley; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; David Haussler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Rapid turnover of functional sequence in human and other genomes.

Authors:  Chris P Ponting; Christoffer Nellåker; Stephen Meader
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 8.929

9.  The evolution of lncRNA repertoires and expression patterns in tetrapods.

Authors:  Anamaria Necsulea; Magali Soumillon; Maria Warnefors; Angélica Liechti; Tasman Daish; Ulrich Zeller; Julie C Baker; Frank Grützner; Henrik Kaessmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse.

Authors:  Duncan T Odom; Robin D Dowell; Elizabeth S Jacobsen; William Gordon; Timothy W Danford; Kenzie D MacIsaac; P Alexander Rolfe; Caitlin M Conboy; David K Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  74 in total

1.  The relativity of biological function.

Authors:  Manfred D Laubichler; Peter F Stadler; Sonja J Prohaska; Katja Nowick
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Limits and patterns of cytomegalovirus genomic diversity in humans.

Authors:  Nicholas Renzette; Cornelia Pokalyuk; Laura Gibson; Bornali Bhattacharjee; Mark R Schleiss; Klaus Hamprecht; Aparecida Y Yamamoto; Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata; William J Britt; Jeffrey D Jensen; Timothy F Kowalik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Principles of miRNA-mRNA interactions: beyond sequence complementarity.

Authors:  Fabian Afonso-Grunz; Sören Müller
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Matthew S Ackerman; Jean-Francois Gout; Hongan Long; Way Sung; W Kelley Thomas; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis.

Authors:  Mashaal Sohail; Olga A Vakhrusheva; Jae Hoon Sul; Sara L Pulit; Laurent C Francioli; Leonard H van den Berg; Jan H Veldink; Paul I W de Bakker; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Aurélie Kapusta; Alexander Suh; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Genetics of Childhood-onset Schizophrenia 2019 Update.

Authors:  Jennifer K Forsyth; Robert F Asarnow
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2019-10-17

Review 8.  When is it MODY? Challenges in the Interpretation of Sequence Variants in MODY Genes.

Authors:  Sara Althari; Anna L Gloyn
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 9.  Noncoding RNAs in neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Evgenia Salta; Bart De Strooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Accurate prediction of cis-regulatory modules reveals a prevalent regulatory genome of humans.

Authors:  Pengyu Ni; Zhengchang Su
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.