Literature DB >> 25057753

The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants.

M Bradley Calobrace1, Peter J Capizzi.   

Abstract

The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25057753     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Mark W Clemens; Andrea L Pusic; Neil A Fine; Jennifer B Hamill; H Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin G Wilkins; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Breast implant illness: a topic in review.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

4.  Smooth versus Textured Implant Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Joshua Vorstenbosch; Colleen M McCarthy; Meghana G Shamsunder; Thais O Polanco; Stefan Dabic; Itay Wiser; Evan Matros; Joseph Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Michele R Cavalli; Elizabeth Encarnacion; Meghan Lee; Babak J Mehrara; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.169

5.  Short-term Safety of a Silicone Gel-filled Breast Implant: A Manufacturer-sponsored, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Seanhyuck Yoon; Jae-Hoon Chang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 6.  History of breast implants: Back to the future.

Authors:  Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo; Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Michail Sorotos
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-03-11

7.  Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants.

Authors:  Mark L Jewell; Bradley P Bengtson; Kate Smither; Gina Nuti; TracyAnn Perry
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  A Preliminary Retrospective Study to Assess the Short-Term Safety of Traditional Smooth or Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Korea.

Authors:  Sanghyuk Han; Robert Kim; Tae Seob Kim; Jung Heum Park; Seung Soo Kim; Cheol Jeong; Ji Heui Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.