AIM: To evaluate connective tissue reactions to iRoot SP (Innovative Bioceramics, Vancouver, BC, Canada), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex (FLPX) (Angelus Soluções Odontológicas, Londrina, Brazil), DiaRoot Bioaggregate (DiaDent Group International, Burnaby, BC, Canada) and white MTA (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) in Wistar rats. METHODOLOGY: A total of 128 dentine tubes filled with the materials and 32 empty tubes (control) were implanted into 32 rats. After 7, 15, 30 and 90 days (n = 8 per period), the animals were euthanized, and the tissues were processed for histological evaluation using haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Von Kossa (VK) staining. Observations were made for cellular inflammatory components and the presence of multinucleated giant cells (MNGC), macrophages and tissue necrosis. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: In all experimental periods, MTA FLPX and iRoot SP scored higher than the other groups for the variable macrophages (P < 0.05). After 30- and 90-day experimental periods, MTA FLPX scored higher than the other groups for the variable MNGC (P < 0.05). After 90 days, the only group that exhibited samples with severe inflammatory response was MTA FLPX. VK positivity was observed in areas of necrosis in all groups, except in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The materials were considered biologically acceptable except MTA FLPX, which remained toxic to subcutaneous tissue even after 90 days.
AIM: To evaluate connective tissue reactions to iRoot SP (Innovative Bioceramics, Vancouver, BC, Canada), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex (FLPX) (Angelus Soluções Odontológicas, Londrina, Brazil), DiaRoot Bioaggregate (DiaDent Group International, Burnaby, BC, Canada) and white MTA (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) in Wistar rats. METHODOLOGY: A total of 128 dentine tubes filled with the materials and 32 empty tubes (control) were implanted into 32 rats. After 7, 15, 30 and 90 days (n = 8 per period), the animals were euthanized, and the tissues were processed for histological evaluation using haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Von Kossa (VK) staining. Observations were made for cellular inflammatory components and the presence of multinucleated giant cells (MNGC), macrophages and tissue necrosis. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: In all experimental periods, MTA FLPX and iRoot SP scored higher than the other groups for the variable macrophages (P < 0.05). After 30- and 90-day experimental periods, MTA FLPX scored higher than the other groups for the variable MNGC (P < 0.05). After 90 days, the only group that exhibited samples with severe inflammatory response was MTA FLPX. VK positivity was observed in areas of necrosis in all groups, except in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The materials were considered biologically acceptable except MTA FLPX, which remained toxic to subcutaneous tissue even after 90 days.