Literature DB >> 25057420

Spontaneous uterine perforation of pyometra presenting as acute abdomen.

Toshihiro Kitai1, Kentaro Okuno1, Hiromi Ugaki1, Yoshiko Komoto1, Satoshi Fujimi2, Masahiko Takemura1.   

Abstract

Pyometra is the accumulation of pus in the uterine cavity, and spontaneous perforation of pyometra resulting in generalized diffuse peritonitis is extremely uncommon. We report a rare case of diffuse peritonitis caused by spontaneous perforation of pyometra. A 66-year-old postmenopausal woman with diffuse abdominal pain and vomiting was admitted to our institution. She had a history of mixed connective-tissue disease and had been taking steroids for 20 years. Under a diagnosis of generalized peritonitis secondary to perforation of the gastrointestinal tract or uterus, supravaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed. Unfortunately, wound dehiscence and infection occurred during the postoperative course, which were exacerbated by her immunocompromised state. Despite intensive care and a course of antibiotics, the patient died of multiple organ failure resulting from sepsis on the 36th postoperative day. Although correct diagnosis, early intervention, and proper treatment can reduce morbidity and mortality of spontaneous perforation of pyometra, if severe infection occurs, this disease can be life threatening for immunocompromised hosts.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25057420      PMCID: PMC4095732          DOI: 10.1155/2014/738568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 2090-6692


1. Introduction

Pyometra is the accumulation of pus in the uterine cavity resulting from interference with its natural drainage [1], which may or may not be associated with malignancy. As an uncommon condition, it has been reported to occur in 0.1-0.2% of all gynecologic patients and 13.6% of elderly gynecologic outpatients [2]. Pyometra develops gradually and, as it progresses, may enlarge the uterus, causing degenerative changes that may rarely lead to sloughing of the uterine wall with subsequent spillage of contents into the abdominal cavity [3]. Spontaneous perforation of pyometra resulting in generalized diffuse peritonitis is very rare. To date, about 50 case reports of spontaneous perforation of pyometra have been documented in the English literature. This paper reports an additional case of spontaneous uterine perforation of pyometra.

2. Case Presentation

A 66-year-old multiparous postmenopausal woman was admitted because of diffuse abdominal pain and vomiting during the previous 24 hours. She had history of mixed connective-tissue disease and had been taking steroids for 20 years. In addition, she had received hemodialysis for chronic renal failure dating from 2 months previously. Her gynecologic history was unremarkable, and there was no history of postmenopausal bleeding or vaginal discharge. On physical examination, she appeared ill, with vital signs as follows: body temperature 37.3°C, blood pressure 96/61 mmHg, pulse rate 82 beats/min, and oxygen saturation 96% (oxygen mask 4 L/min). Her abdomen was distended, with tenderness in the lower portion. Vaginal examination showed no cervical and vaginal anomalies, vaginal discharge, or detectable pelvic mass. Results of laboratory investigations on admission were as follows: white blood cell (WBC) count 3.0 × 103/μL, hemoglobin 11.3 g/dL, and C-reactive protein (CRP) 7.32 mg/dL. Progression to sepsis was suspected because the WBC count documented at the previous institution was 13.0 × 103/μL, a drastic decline. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed the presence of fluid within the abdominal cavity and a significantly distended fluid-filled uterus. In addition, free air was detected in the abdominal and uterine cavities (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Transverse view of contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showing the presence of fluid within the abdominal cavity and a significantly distended fluid-filled uterus. In addition, free air was detected in the abdominal and uterine cavities. White arrow indicates the perforation site.

A preoperative diagnosis of generalized peritonitis secondary to perforation of the gastrointestinal tract or uterus was established. Consequently, emergent laparotomy was performed. At laparotomy about 300 mL of seropurulent, fluid was encountered in the peritoneal cavity. No abnormal findings were found in the gastrointestinal tract; however, a perforation with a diameter of 1 cm was found in the uterine fundus. The fallopian tubes and ovaries were normal. A supravaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The resected corpus of the uterus. White arrow indicates the perforation site.

Culture of the pus grew Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis. Histologic examination revealed pyometra with no evidence of malignancy. Cervical cytology performed after surgery was negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy. Figure 3 shows the postoperative course. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit with strict management of respiration and circulation. Under antibiotic therapy with doripenem (750 mg/day, daily administration), her condition improved over time and she was transferred to the gynecology unit on postoperative day (POD) 8. However, she broke into high fever on POD 9. Antibiotics were changed from doripenem to micafungin (75 mg/day, daily administration) because the culture of her sputum grew Candida albicans and β-d-glucan was increased in the blood. Subsequently, wound dehiscence occurred, and secondary wound closure was performed on POD 11. She was transferred to the intensive care unit again after surgery, and vancomycin (500 mg/day, alternate-day administration) was added to antibiotic therapy because methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was detected from wound culture. From POD 11, high fever continued and platelet count declined once again. Although hepatic and renal dysfunctions were not revealed, sepsis and multiple organ failure were suspected. Despite the readministration of doripenem, thromboses of the inferior vena cava caused by infection and cerebral infarction were found on POD 26. Although antibiotics were changed from doripenem to linezolid (600 mg/day, daily administration) or vancomycin, sepsis grew progressively worse. Despite exhaustive clinical efforts, the patient died on POD 36.
Figure 3

Postoperative course. BT: body temperature; WBC: white blood cell count; Hb: hemoglobin; Plt: platelet; CRP: C-reactive protein; DRPM: doripenem; MCFG: micafungin; VCM: vancomycin; LZD: linezolid.

3. Discussion

Pyometra is rare in the general population but more common in elderly women. It is caused as a result of occlusion of the cervical canal by malignant or benign tumors, surgery, radiotherapy, or senile cervicitis [11]. Pyometra is a difficult diagnosis. The classic triad of symptoms is postmenopausal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and lower abdominal pain, but none of these is specific for pyometra and some patients have no symptoms at all [29]. Spontaneous perforation of pyometra is no less rare. To date, only 50 case reports have been documented in the English literature. A PubMed literature search using key words such as “pyometra,” “perforation,” and “rupture” was performed, and only English-language articles were collected. Table 1 summarizes the 42 cases of spontaneous perforation of pyometra during the past decade, from 2004 to 2013, including our case. The median age was 75 years (range, 40–93). The common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (41 cases, 97.6%), fever (23 cases, 54.8%), and vomiting (13 cases, 31.0%). No case had genital bleeding and five cases (11.9%) were in shock at the time of admission. Data regarding the associated malignancy were available in all 42 cases. Of the 11 cases (26.2%) with malignant tumor, eight (72.7%) had cervical cancer and three (27.3%) had sigmoid colon cancer. Although preoperative diagnosis was confirmed in all 42 cases, an accurate preoperative diagnosis was made in only 13 cases (30.9%). The other preoperative diagnoses included perforation of the gastrointestinal tract in 20 cases (47.6%), generalized peritonitis in five cases (11.9%), appendicitis in one case (2.4%), pneumoperitoneum in one case (2.4%), mesenteric artery ischemia in one case (2.4%), and incarcerated hernia in one case (2.4%). The low preoperative diagnostic rate suggested that preoperative diagnosis of spontaneous perforation of pyometra was difficult. Laparotomy was performed in all 42 cases as an initial treatment. Total, subtotal, or supravaginal hysterectomies were performed in 37 cases (88.1%), drainage in four cases (9.5%), and surgical closure of perforated uterine wall in one case (2.4%). Data regarding the perforation site were available in 35 cases. The sites of uterine perforation were the fundus in 27 cases (77.1%), anterior in five cases (14.3%), and posterior in three cases (8.6%). Bacteriological studies of peritoneal pus were performed in 25 cases. The common etiological organisms were Escherichia coli (10 cases, 40.0%) and Bacteroides species (five cases, 20.0%). The other bacteria were Klebsiella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Porphyromonas, Enterococcus, and Actinomyces species. No bacteria were detected from the culture in four cases (16.0%). Data regarding complicated diseases were available in 29 cases. Nine cases (31.0%) involved an immunocompromised state, such as renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and steroid administration. The prognoses were documented in 33 cases. The total number of patients who died was five (15.2%). Of those in an immunocompromised state, four patients died, or the mortality rate was 44.4%. This may suggest that immunocompromised hosts represent a group at high risk for spontaneous perforation of pyometra. It is hoped that further cases are accumulated and that statistical analysis is performed.
Table 1

Cases of spontaneous perforation of pyometra from the literature review and our own case.

PatientsFirst authorAgeSymptomsPreoperative diagnosisAssociated malignancyPerforation siteBacterial cultureTreatment Immunocompromised stateOutcome
1Nuamah [4]79AP, F, and VPGITNoneFundusNDTAH + BSONDDied (MOF)
2Shahid [5]80APPGITCCFundusNDTAH + BSONDSurvived
3Chan [6]73AP, shockPPNoneFundus Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus viridans TAH + BSODMSurvived
4Tsai [7]40AP, FGPNoneFundusNDSTHNDSurvived
5Yildizhan [8]92AP, VPGITNoneFundus Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis TAH + BSONDSurvived
6Geranpayeh [9]63AP, F, and VPGITNoneNDNegativeTAH + BSONDSurvived
7Lee [10]60AP, FPGITCCFundus B. fragilis TAH + BSODM, RFND
8Saha [3]60APPGITNoneFundus Staphylococcus aureus SVH + BSONDSurvived
9Li [11]69AP, F, and VPGIT, GPNoneAnterior B. fragilis SVH + BSONoneSurvived
10Vyas [12]60AP, VPPCCFundus Acinetobacter speciesDrainageNDSurvived
11Izumi [13]83APPPNoneFundus Bacteroides distasonis, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, and Streptococcus oralis TAHNoneSurvived
12Ou [14]78AP, FPGITSCCNDNDTAH + BSONDND
1354AP, FPneumoperitoneumNoneNDNDTAH + BSONDND
1478APPPCCNDNDTAH + BSONDND
1580APPGITCCNDNDDrainageNDND
1673AP, FPPCCNDNDTAH + BSONDND
1781AP, FGPNoneNDNDTAHNDND
18Kim [15]80APPPNoneFundusNDTAH + BSONoneSurvived
19Chen [16]68AP, FPGITSCCFundusNDTAH + BSO + OMENDSurvived
20Agarwal [17]60AP, FPGITCCFundusNDDrainageNDSurvived
21Stunell [18]64APPPNoneFundusNDTAH + BSONoneND
22Lim [19]89AP, FGPITNoneFundus E. coli TAH + BSONoneSurvived
2387APGPITNoneFundus Enterococcus faecalis Surgical closureNoneND
24Chaopotong [20]88AP, F, and VGPNoneFundusNegativeTAH + BSODMDied (sepsis)
25Sahoo [21]50AP, F, and shockGPITNoneFundusNDTAH + BSONDSurvived
26Shapey [22]84AP, VGPITNoneAnteriorNegativeTAHSteroid administrationSurvived
27Ikeda [23]80APPPCCAnterior E. coli TAH + BSONoneSurvived
2881AP, FPGITNoneFundus E. coli TAH + BSONoneSurvived
2993AP, FPGITNonePosterior K. pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus speciesTAHNoneSurvived
3084APPGITSCCAnterior E. coli TAH + BSONoneSurvived
3174AP, FPPNoneFundus E. coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis STH + BSONoneSurvived
3279AP, FAppendicitisNoneFundus E. coli TAHNoneSurvived
3366ShockPPNoneAnterior K. pneumoniae DrainageDMDied (strangulation ileus)
34Kutuk [24]71AP, F, and VGPNoneFundus E. coli TAH + BSONDSurvived
3575AP, VMesenteric artery ischemiaNoneFundusNegativeTAH + BSONoneSurvived
3668APGPITNonePosterior E. coli TAH + BSORFDied (sepsis)
37Hagiya [25]86AP, shockPPNoneFundus Actinomyces speciesTAH + BSODMSurvived
38Mallah [26]78AP, F, and VIncarcerated herniaNoneFundusNDTAH + BSONoneSurvived
3961AP, F, V, and shockGPNonePosteriorNDTAH + BSONoneSurvived
40Abu-Zaid [27]63AP, F, and VPPNoneFundus Streptococcus constellatus TAH + BSONoneSurvived
41Patil [28]74AP, FPGITNoneFundusNDTAH + BSODMSurvived
42Kitai [present case]66AP, VPPNoneFundus E. coli, B. fragilis SVH + BSORF, steroid administrationDied (sepsis)

AP: abdominal pain; F: fever; V: vomiting; PGIT: perforation of the gastrointestinal tract; PP: perforation of pyometra; GP: generalized peritonitis; CC: cervical cancer; SCC: sigmoid colon cancer; TAH: total abdominal hysterectomy; STH: subtotal hysterectomy; SVH: supravaginal hysterectomy; BSO: bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; DM: diabetes mellitus; RF: renal failure; MOF: multiple organ failure.

4. Conclusion

Although correct diagnosis, early intervention, and proper treatment can reduce morbidity and mortality of spontaneous perforation of pyometra, if severe infection occurs, this disease can be life threatening for immunocompromised hosts.
  28 in total

1.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra presented as an acute abdomen: a case report.

Authors:  Pradip Kumar Saha; Pratiksha Gupta; Reeti Mehra; Poonam Goel; Anju Huria
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-01-22

2.  Clinical characteristics of perforated pyometra and impending perforation: specific issues in gynecological emergency.

Authors:  Yu-Che Ou; Kuo-Chung Lan; Hao Lin; Ching-Chou Tsai; Chan-Chao ChangChien
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 3.  Spontaneous uterine perforation as a serious complication of pyometra in elderly females.

Authors:  M Sawabe; K Takubo; Y Esaki; N Hatano; T Noro; M Nokubi
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 4.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra: a report of seven cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michi Ikeda; Toshifumi Takahashi; Hirohisa Kurachi
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra in an elderly woman: a case report.

Authors:  Pattama Chaopotong; Mongkol Benjapibal; Manopchai Thamkhantho
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2012-05

6.  Computed tomography features of spontaneously perforated pyometra: a case report.

Authors:  K S Chan; C K Tan; C W Mak; C C Chia; C Y Kuo; W L Yu
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 7.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra.

Authors:  Begüm Yildizhan; Esra Uyar; Alper Sişmanoğlu; Gülfem Güllüoğlu; Zehra N Kavak
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006

8.  Generalized peritonitis secondary to spontaneous perforation of pyometra in a 63-year-old patient.

Authors:  Ahmed Abu-Zaid; Osama Alomar; Ahmed Nazer; Ayman Azzam; Zainab Abudan; Ismail Al-Badawi
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-29

9.  Rare cause of acute surgical abdomen with free intraperitoneal air: Spontaneous perforated pyometra. A report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Siew Fung Lim; Song Liang Lee; Adrian Kah Heng Chiow; Chek Siang Foo; Andrew Siang Yih Wong; Su-Ming Tan
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-29

10.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra in a cervical cancer patient: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Sameer Vyas; Ajay Kumar; Mahesh Prakash; Rakesh Kapoor; Pankaj Kumar; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spontaneous perforation of pyometra presenting as acute abdomen and pneumoperitoneum mimicking those of gastrointestinal origin.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamada; Nanako Ando; Naoshi Shibata; Motomu Suitou; Hiroshi Takagi; Kazutoshi Matsunami; Satoshi Ichigo; Atsushi Imai
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-01-05

2.  Postmenopausal spontaneous uterine perforation: Case report.

Authors:  Elçin İşlek Seçen; Hilal Ağış; Canan Altunkaya; Ayşe Filiz Avşar
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Pyometra due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Nathan McLeod; Allison Lastinger
Journal:  IDCases       Date:  2019-05-07

4.  Damage Control Management of Perforating Pyometra Presenting with Septic Shock after the Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

Authors:  Jumpei Takamatsu; Jinkoo Kang; Aya Fukuhara; Tomoya Matsuda; Tomo Ishida
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Postoperative Streptococcus constellatus Bacteremia in a 75-Year-Old Patient with Pyometra: A Case Report.

Authors:  Alessia Sala; Stefano Restaino; Chiara De Carlo; Martina Comand; Alberto Frigo; Samuele Martínez Rivero; Elisa Zanetti; Lorenza Driul
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  Pyometra, an Unusual Case of Acute Abdomen.

Authors:  Kyle E Nielsen; Sarah A Medeck; Dan B Brillhart; Kasey J Mayclin
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-12

7.  Postmenopausal spontaneous rupture of pyometra: A case report.

Authors:  Yiping Huang; Qifang Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.