| Literature DB >> 25057272 |
Wang Guangjun1, Tian Yuying1, Jia Shuyong1, Zhou Wenting1, Zhang Weibo1.
Abstract
Background. The specificity of acupuncture points (acupoints) is one of the key concepts in traditional acupuncture theory, but the question of whether there is adequate scientific evidence to prove or disprove specificity has been vigorously debated in recent years. Acupoint laterality is an important aspect of acupoint specificity. Data is particularly scarce regarding the laterality of the same channel, namesake acupoint located on opposite sides of the body. Our previous study results suggest that Neiguan acupoint (PC6) has the laterality. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Hegu (LI4) also has laterality from the perspective of heart rate variability. Methods. A total of twenty-eight healthy female volunteers were recruited for this study and were randomly separated into the group I (n = 14) and the group II (n = 14) according to the register order. In the group I, left LI4 was stimulated in the first epoch and the right LI4 was stimulated in the second epoch. In the group II, right LI4 was stimulated in the first epoch and left LI4 was stimulated in the second epoch. Electrocardiogram was recorded and heart rate variability was analyzed. Results. The results show that there were no significant differences of heart rate variablity between the group I and the group II in the time domain and in the frequency domain. Conclusions. Bilateral Hegu acupoints have the same effect on the heart rate variability of the healthy subjects.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25057272 PMCID: PMC4099173 DOI: 10.1155/2014/106940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Basic characteristics of the study participants.
| Characters | Group I ( | Group II ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 26.14 ± 1.19 | 25.93 ± 1.39 |
| High (cm) | 164.93 ± 3.92 | 162.21 ± 4.35 |
| Body weight (kg) | 54.64 ± 6.96 | 52.64 ± 4.92 |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 18.69 ± 5.61 | 20.01 ± 1.7 |
Figure 1Procedure of acupuncture and measurement. ECG recording time point; IN: insert needle; SA: stop acupuncture; SR: slowly rotate the needle every 5 min. The needle was slowly rotated every 5 min for a total of 30 min during the C1 and C2 acupuncture sessions; RT: rest time between two epochs.
Results of heart rate variability.
| Group I ( | Group II ( |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | C1 | C2 | |||
| Mean RR (ms) | 876.72 ± 90.13 | 843.27 ± 54.87 | 913.64 ± 142.68 | 865.18 ± 106.56 | −0.5474 | 0.5888 |
| STD RR (ms) | 55.9 ± 16.66 | 54.85 ± 16.24 | 55.19 ± 13.26 | 53.62 ± 20.08 | −0.1349 | 0.8938 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 45.93 ± 21.62 | 41.4 ± 17.62 | 45.48 ± 18.95 | 41.89 ± 26.63 | 0.1772 | 0.8607 |
| NN50 (count) | 464.86 ± 362.08 | 446 ± 371.65 | 476.64 ± 316.35 | 395.43 ± 409.93 | −0.7654 | 0.4509 |
| pNN50 (%) | 23.48 ± 19.79 | 21.47 ± 18.56 | 25.21 ± 17.83 | 19.92 ± 21.39 | −0.7206 | 0.4776 |
| VLF (ms2) | 1602.75 ± 925.69 | 1567.78 ± 1097.23 | 1379.81 ± 585.48 | 1401.52 ± 578.8 | 0.2157 | 0.8309 |
| LF (ms2) | 601.15 ± 389.84 | 586.25 ± 374.28 | 568.15 ± 555.34 | 549.14 ± 528.43 | −0.0463 | 0.9634 |
| HF (ms2) | 966.4 ± 862.48 | 834.81 ± 713.49 | 1046.1 ± 823.59 | 1059.35 ± 1425.28 | 0.5885 | 0.5613 |
| VLF (%) | 54.53 ± 16.2 | 54 ± 15.25 | 50.17 ± 19.04 | 56.03 ± 16.78 | 1.5706 | 0.1284 |
| LF (%) | 18.04 ± 6.66 | 19.11 ± 6.8 | 17.8 ± 11.91 | 17.21 ± 5.69 | −0.6633 | 0.513 |
| HF (%) | 27.39 ± 13.85 | 26.86 ± 13.96 | 32 ± 15.89 | 26.72 ± 14.51 | −1.267 | 0.2164 |
| LF (n.u.) | 41.44 ± 12.61 | 44.12 ± 16.84 | 35.73 ± 18.11 | 41.17 ± 12.98 | 0.6232 | 0.5386 |
| HF (n.u.) | 58.47 ± 12.62 | 55.81 ± 16.84 | 64.2 ± 18.11 | 58.76 ± 12.99 | −0.6254 | 0.5372 |
| Total power (ms2) | 3171.55 ± 1873.31 | 2989.72 ± 1860.04 | 2994.95 ± 1327.92 | 3011.03 ± 2345 | 0.4523 | 0.6548 |
| LF/HF ratio | 0.78 ± 0.37 | 1.01 ± 0.83 | 0.76 ± 0.81 | 0.8 ± 0.53 | −0.8358 | 0.4109 |
RR: RR intervals; STDRR: standard deviation of RR intervals; RMSSD: root mean square of successive differences between RR intervals; NN50: the number of successive intervals differing more than 50 ms; pNN50: the corresponding relative amount of NN50 (pNN50); LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; VLF: very low frequency; data are expressed as mean ± SD. For each parameter, the difference of C1-C2 was calculated and then t-test was performed between the group I and the group II.