J G Hanly1, K Thompson2, C Skedgel3. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada john.hanly@cdha.nshealth.ca. 2. Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 3. Atlantic Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Capital Health, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to validate and compare decision rules for the identification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in administrative healthcare databases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using administrative health care data from a population of 1 million people with access to universal healthcare. Information was available on hospital discharges and physician billings over a 10-year period. Each SLE case was matched 4:1 by age and gender to randomly selected controls. Seven case definitions were applied to identify SLE cases and their performance compared with the diagnosis by a rheumatologist. RESULTS: We identified 373 SLE cases and 1492 non-SLE controls, all of whom had been reviewed by a rheumatologist. The overall accuracy of the case definitions for SLE cases varied between 88.2-95.6% with a kappa statistic between 0.53-0.86. The sensitivity varied from 41.0-86.6% and the specificity between 92.4-99.9%. In a total reference population of 1 million the mean estimated annual incidence of SLE was between 29-255 and the mean estimated annual prevalence was between 172-920. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of case definitions for the identification of SLE patients in administrative healthcare databases is variable and this should be considered when comparing results across studies. This variability may also be used to advantage in different study designs depending on the relative importance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying the population of interest to the research question.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to validate and compare decision rules for the identification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in administrative healthcare databases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using administrative health care data from a population of 1 million people with access to universal healthcare. Information was available on hospital discharges and physician billings over a 10-year period. Each SLE case was matched 4:1 by age and gender to randomly selected controls. Seven case definitions were applied to identify SLE cases and their performance compared with the diagnosis by a rheumatologist. RESULTS: We identified 373 SLE cases and 1492 non-SLE controls, all of whom had been reviewed by a rheumatologist. The overall accuracy of the case definitions for SLE cases varied between 88.2-95.6% with a kappa statistic between 0.53-0.86. The sensitivity varied from 41.0-86.6% and the specificity between 92.4-99.9%. In a total reference population of 1 million the mean estimated annual incidence of SLE was between 29-255 and the mean estimated annual prevalence was between 172-920. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of case definitions for the identification of SLEpatients in administrative healthcare databases is variable and this should be considered when comparing results across studies. This variability may also be used to advantage in different study designs depending on the relative importance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying the population of interest to the research question.
Authors: Rachel A Bender Ignacio; Amy T Madison; Ata Moshiri; Noel S Weiss; Beth A Mueller Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Scott E Wenderfer; Joyce C Chang; Amy Goodwin Davies; Ingrid Y Luna; Rebecca Scobell; Cora Sears; Bliss Magella; Mark Mitsnefes; Brian R Stotter; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Katherine D Nowicki; Bradley P Dixon; Megan Kelton; Joseph T Flynn; Caroline Gluck; Mahmoud Kallash; William E Smoyer; Andrea Knight; Sangeeta Sule; Hanieh Razzaghi; L Charles Bailey; Susan L Furth; Christopher B Forrest; Michelle R Denburg; Meredith A Atkinson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Rayan Najjar; Swetha A Alexander; Grant C Hughes; Jinoos Yazdany; Namrata Singh Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Christie M Bartels; Ann Chodara; Yi Chen; Xing Wang; W Ryan Powell; Fangfang Shi; Maria Schletzbaum; Ann M Sheehy; Farah A Kaiksow; Andrea L Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Shivani Garg; Menggang Yu; Amy J Kind Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 5.431
Authors: Alaina Davis; Joyce Chang; Sarah Shapiro; Marisa Klein-Gitelman; Jennifer Faerber; Hannah Katcoff; Zuleyha Cidav; David S Mandell; Andrea Knight Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 5.178