Literature DB >> 25056284

Development of clinical models for predicting erectile function after localized prostate cancer treatment.

Amy E Haskins1, Paul K J Han, Frances L Lucas, Ian Bristol, Moritz Hansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical prediction models estimating the probability of maintaining erections adequate for intercourse 2 years after prostate cancer treatment, based on pretreatment characteristics.
METHODS: Study participants consisted of prostate cancer patients with localized disease and functional erections before undergoing surgery (n = 536) or radiation therapy (n = 240) at a single USA institution. Baseline patient- and treatment-related data were collected from a clinical database and through chart review. Erectile function at 2 years post-treatment was prospectively assessed through a self-administered single-item measure. Multivariate logistic regression using backward selection was used to derive clinical prediction models to predict erectile function at 2 years for surgery and radiation therapy patients; the models were internally validated using bootstrapping methods.
RESULTS: The final prediction model for surgery patients included the predictor variables of age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and nerve-sparing procedures, whereas the model for radiation therapy patients included hypertension, risk category and radiation technique. The new models showed acceptable calibration and discrimination: c-statistic = 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.76) for surgery and 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.74) for radiation therapy models.
CONCLUSIONS: New clinical prediction models based on patient and treatment characteristics show promising accuracy in predicting erectile function at 2 years in patients treated with surgery and radiation for localized prostate cancer. More work is required to confirm and validate these models in different patient populations.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision support techniques; erectile dysfunction; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056284     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  4 in total

1.  [Shared decision-making in prostate cancer patients].

Authors:  S Gröger; C Mäder-Porombka; C Stang; S Wallacher
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Tools for predicting patient-reported outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic accuracy and validity.

Authors:  M E O'Callaghan; E Raymond; J Campbell; A D Vincent; K Beckmann; D Roder; S Evans; J McNeil; J Millar; J Zalcberg; M Borg; K Moretti
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Prospective evaluation of a specific technique of sexual function preservation in external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hamza Samlali; Corina Udrescu; Ariane Lapierre; Ciprian Enachescu; Alain Ruffion; Patrice Jalade; Olivier Chapet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Yangchang Zhang; Fuxun Zhang; Changjing Wu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.408

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.