Jae Yong Choi1, Byoung Soo Kim2, Chul Hoon Kim3, Dong Goo Kim3, Sang Jin Han1, Kyochul Lee2, Kyeong Min Kim2, Gwangil An2, Tae Hyun Choi2, Sun Dong Yoo4, Young Hoon Ryu1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, 135-720, Korea. 2. Department of Molecular Imaging, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, 139-706, Korea. 3. Department of Pharmacology, Brain Research Institute, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. 4. College of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 440-746, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the cerebral uptake and binding potential of [18 F]FCWAY and [18 F]Mefway in the rodent to assess their potential for imaging serotonin 1A (5-HT1A ) receptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro liver microsomal studies were performed to evaluate the degree of defluorination. Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) studies were then conducted for 2 h with or without an anti-defluorination agent. The regions of interest were the hippocampus and frontal cortex (5-HT1A target regions) and the cerebellum (5-HT1A nontarget region). The in vivo kinetics of the radioligands were compared based on the brain uptake values and target-to-nontarget ratio. We also performed a comparison of binding potential (BPND ) as a steady-state binding parameter. Finally, binding affinities to 5-HT1A receptors were assessed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) cells expressing human recombinant 5-HT1A receptors. RESULTS: The radiochemical yield of [18 F]Mefway was slightly higher than that of [18 F]FCWAY (19 vs. 15%). With regard to metabolic stability against defluorination, both compounds exhibited similar stability in rat liver microsomes, but [18 F]Mefway displayed higher stability in the human microsome (defluorination ratio at 30 min: 32 vs. 29 in rat liver microsomes, 31 vs. 64 in human liver microsomes for [18 F]Mefway and [18 F]FCWAY, respectively). There were no significant differences in brain uptake, the target-to-nontarget ratios, and the BPND (at hippocampus, peak brain uptakes: 6.9 vs. 8.5, target-to-nontarget ratios: 6.9 vs. 8.5, BPND : 5.2 vs. 6.2 for [18 F]Mefway and [18 F]FCWAY). The binding affinity of [18 F]Mefway was considerably higher than that of [18 F]FCWAY (IC50 : 1.5 nM vs. 2.2 nM). CONCLUSION: [18 F]Mefway exhibits favorable characteristics compared to [18 F]FCWAY in rodents, and may be a promising radioligand for use in human subjects. Synapse 68:595-603, 2014.
PURPOSE: To compare the cerebral uptake and binding potential of [18 F]FCWAY and [18 F]Mefway in the rodent to assess their potential for imaging serotonin 1A (5-HT1A ) receptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro liver microsomal studies were performed to evaluate the degree of defluorination. Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) studies were then conducted for 2 h with or without an anti-defluorination agent. The regions of interest were the hippocampus and frontal cortex (5-HT1A target regions) and the cerebellum (5-HT1A nontarget region). The in vivo kinetics of the radioligands were compared based on the brain uptake values and target-to-nontarget ratio. We also performed a comparison of binding potential (BPND ) as a steady-state binding parameter. Finally, binding affinities to 5-HT1A receptors were assessed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) cells expressing human recombinant 5-HT1A receptors. RESULTS: The radiochemical yield of [18 F]Mefway was slightly higher than that of [18 F]FCWAY (19 vs. 15%). With regard to metabolic stability against defluorination, both compounds exhibited similar stability in rat liver microsomes, but [18 F]Mefway displayed higher stability in the human microsome (defluorination ratio at 30 min: 32 vs. 29 in rat liver microsomes, 31 vs. 64 in human liver microsomes for [18 F]Mefway and [18 F]FCWAY, respectively). There were no significant differences in brain uptake, the target-to-nontarget ratios, and the BPND (at hippocampus, peak brain uptakes: 6.9 vs. 8.5, target-to-nontarget ratios: 6.9 vs. 8.5, BPND : 5.2 vs. 6.2 for [18 F]Mefway and [18 F]FCWAY). The binding affinity of [18 F]Mefway was considerably higher than that of [18 F]FCWAY (IC50 : 1.5 nM vs. 2.2 nM). CONCLUSION: [18 F]Mefway exhibits favorable characteristics compared to [18 F]FCWAY in rodents, and may be a promising radioligand for use in human subjects. Synapse 68:595-603, 2014.