BACKROUND: The extent of hemodynamic disturbances following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) varies. We aim to determine the prognostic implications of unilateral and bilateral autoregulatory failure on delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and outcome. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with aneurysmal SAH were recruited. Autoregulation was assessed using systolic flow index-Sxa. Interhemispheric difference in autoregulation was calculated to assess the spatial distribution and symmetry of autoregulatory changes. Assessment of interhemispheric difference in autoregulation in combination with overall autoregulation was used to measure the extent of autoregulatory impairment. Patients were dichotomized by the presence of DCI and 3-month mRS. RESULTS: Higher flow velocity and worse autoregulation (p < 0.0000001, 95 % CI 10.7-21.3 and p = 0.00001, 95 % CI 0.03-0.07 for difference in FV and Sxa, respectively) were found ipsilateral to the ischemic hemisphere or location of aneurysm (if no ischemia detected). DCI group had a higher interhemispheric difference of autoregulation than non-DCI group (p = 0.035, 95 % CI 0.003-0.08). 16/18 patients with unfavorable outcome vs. 17/72 with favorable outcome had overall poor autoregulation with low interhemispheric differences (p = 0.0013, χ (2)). Unilateral autoregulatory failure was seen on a median day 3, bilateral on day 4, and vasospasm was detected on day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral autoregulation failure was seen in patients who developed DCI (worse ipsilateral to the ischemic hemisphere). Bilateral autoregulation failure was seen more frequently in patients with unfavorable outcome. Analysis of the temporal profile showed unilateral dysautoregulation as the primary event predisposing to DCI, which in selected cases led to bilateral failure and unfavorable outcomes.
BACKROUND: The extent of hemodynamic disturbances following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) varies. We aim to determine the prognostic implications of unilateral and bilateral autoregulatory failure on delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and outcome. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with aneurysmal SAH were recruited. Autoregulation was assessed using systolic flow index-Sxa. Interhemispheric difference in autoregulation was calculated to assess the spatial distribution and symmetry of autoregulatory changes. Assessment of interhemispheric difference in autoregulation in combination with overall autoregulation was used to measure the extent of autoregulatory impairment. Patients were dichotomized by the presence of DCI and 3-month mRS. RESULTS: Higher flow velocity and worse autoregulation (p < 0.0000001, 95 % CI 10.7-21.3 and p = 0.00001, 95 % CI 0.03-0.07 for difference in FV and Sxa, respectively) were found ipsilateral to the ischemic hemisphere or location of aneurysm (if no ischemia detected). DCI group had a higher interhemispheric difference of autoregulation than non-DCI group (p = 0.035, 95 % CI 0.003-0.08). 16/18 patients with unfavorable outcome vs. 17/72 with favorable outcome had overall poor autoregulation with low interhemispheric differences (p = 0.0013, χ (2)). Unilateral autoregulatory failure was seen on a median day 3, bilateral on day 4, and vasospasm was detected on day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral autoregulation failure was seen in patients who developed DCI (worse ipsilateral to the ischemic hemisphere). Bilateral autoregulation failure was seen more frequently in patients with unfavorable outcome. Analysis of the temporal profile showed unilateral dysautoregulation as the primary event predisposing to DCI, which in selected cases led to bilateral failure and unfavorable outcomes.
Authors: Enrico Sorrentino; Karol P Budohoski; Magdalena Kasprowicz; Peter Smielewski; Basil Matta; John D Pickard; Marek Czosnyka Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J Claassen; G L Bernardini; K Kreiter; J Bates; Y E Du; D Copeland; E S Connolly; S A Mayer Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mervyn D I Vergouwen; Marinus Vermeulen; Jan van Gijn; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Eelco F Wijdicks; J Paul Muizelaar; A David Mendelow; Seppo Juvela; Howard Yonas; Karel G Terbrugge; R Loch Macdonald; Michael N Diringer; Joseph P Broderick; Jens P Dreier; Yvo B W E M Roos Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Eric A Schmidt; Marek Czosnyka; Luzius A Steiner; Marcella Balestreri; Piotr Smielewski; Stefan K Piechnik; Basil F Matta; John D Pickard Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Karol P Budohoski; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Magdalena Kasprowicz; Adel Helmy; Diederik Bulters; John D Pickard; Peter J Kirkpatrick Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Forrest A Brooks; Uvieoghene Ughwanogho; Galen V Henderson; Randie Black-Schaffer; Farzaneh A Sorond; Can Ozan Tan Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Gabriela A Santos; Nils Petersen; Amir A Zamani; Rose Du; Sarah LaRose; Andrew Monk; Farzaneh A Sorond; Can Ozan Tan Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mais Al-Kawaz; Sung-Min Cho; Rebecca F Gottesman; Jose I Suarez; Lucia Rivera-Lara Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Georgios V Varsos; Karol P Budohoski; Marek Czosnyka; Angelos G Kolias; Nathalie Nasr; Joseph Donnelly; Xiuyun Liu; Dong-Joo Kim; Peter J Hutchinson; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Vassilis G Varsos; Peter Smielewski Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 6.200