Literature DB >> 25056005

Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP.

Mary C Potter1, Carl Erick Hagmann.   

Abstract

Pictured objects and scenes can be understood in a brief glimpse, but there is a debate about whether they are first encoded at the basic level (e.g., banana), as proposed by Rosch et al. (1976, Cognitive Psychology) , or at a superordinate level (e.g., fruit). The level at which we first categorize an object matters in everyday situations because it determines whether we approach, avoid, or ignore the object. In the present study, we limited stimulus duration in order to explore the earliest level of object understanding. Target objects were presented among five other pictures using RSVP at 80, 53, 27, or 13 ms/picture. On each trial, participants viewed or heard 1 of 28 superordinate names or a corresponding basic-level name of the target. The name appeared before or after the picture sequence. Detection (as d') improved as duration increased but was significantly above chance in all conditions and for all durations. When the name was given before the sequence, d' was higher for the basic than for the superordinate name, showing that specific advance information facilitated visual encoding. In the name-after group, performance on the two category levels did not differ significantly; this suggests that encoding had occurred at the basic level during presentation, allowing the superordinate category to be inferred. We interpret the results as being consistent with the claim that the basic level is usually the entry level for object perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25056005     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0692-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Time to understand pictures and words.

Authors:  M C Potter; B A Faulconer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Object detection and basic-level categorization: sometimes you know it is there before you know what it is.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Isabel Gauthier; Javid Sadr; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

3.  Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free?

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Pictures and names: making the connection.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; M A Gluck; S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Picture detection in rapid serial visual presentation: features or identity?

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Brad Wyble; Rijuta Pandav; Jennifer Olejarczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage.

Authors:  Timothy T Rogers; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

10.  The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird.

Authors:  Marc J-M Macé; Olivier R Joubert; Jean-Luc Nespoulous; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ultrafast scene detection and recognition with limited visual information.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-07-08

2.  Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Juan D Guevara Pinto; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Relating categorization to set summary statistics perception.

Authors:  Noam Khayat; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Is there a serial bottleneck in visual object recognition?

Authors:  Dina V Popovkina; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.