Literature DB >> 25055209

Neural Network Analysis of Different Segmentation Strategies of Nerve Fiber Layer Assessment for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Jose M Larrosa1, Vicente Polo, Antonio Ferreras, Elena García-Martín, Pilar Calvo, Luis E Pablo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of different segmentations of the nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness measurements using an artificial neural network and to define the optimal number of sectors with best diagnostic ability for glaucoma diagnosis.
METHODS: A total of 117 glaucoma patients and 123 normal subjects were included in the study. NFL thickness measurements were performed using the Spectralis-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) to obtain the NFL thickness average; measurements from 2 semicircles, 4 quadrants, and 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, and 64 sectors; and 768 uniformly divided locations around the peripapillary NFL. An artificial neural network evaluation was performed to compare the influence of sector analysis on the diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the diagnostic ability of the different segmentation analyses.
RESULTS: The 6 sectors divided by the horizontal division of the nasal and temporal quadrants were better than the 6 sectors divided by the vertical line through the superior and inferior quadrants [areas under curve, 0.778; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.720-0.829 and 0.814; 95% CI, 0.759-0.861, respectively]. In the case of quadrants, clock quadrants (area under curve 0.770; 95% CI, 0.712-0.822) were better than the ISNT (inferior-superior-nasal-temporal) quadrants (area under curve, 0.770; 95% CI, 0.712-0.822; P=0.003). The first segmentation strategy that improved the diagnostic value of 4 ISNT quadrants was the 12-sector analysis (area under curve, 0.845; 95% CI, 0.793-0.889; P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2 best candidate strategies for the OCT report were the 12-sector analysis and the 4 planimetric quadrant (alternatively, the 4 clock quadrants) analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25055209     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Deep learning and neuronal networks in ophthalmology : Applications in the field of optical coherence tomography].

Authors:  M Treder; N Eter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Identification of clusters in multifocal electrophysiology recordings to maximize discriminant capacity (patients vs. control subjects).

Authors:  M Ortiz Del Castillo; B Cordón; E M Sánchez Morla; E Vilades; M J Rodrigo; C Cavaliere; L Boquete; E Garcia-Martin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis: An evidence based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Kansal; James J Armstrong; Robert Pintwala; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Assess Spatial Patterns of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mengyu Wang; Lucy Q Shen; Louis R Pasquale; Hui Wang; Dian Li; Eun Young Choi; Siamak Yousefi; Peter J Bex; Tobias Elze
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Assessing Surface Shapes of the Optic Nerve Head and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Glaucoma with Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Chhavi Saini; Lucy Q Shen; Louis R Pasquale; Michael V Boland; David S Friedman; Nazlee Zebardast; Mojtaba Fazli; Yangjiani Li; Mohammad Eslami; Tobias Elze; Mengyu Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Diagnose Glaucoma and Detect Glaucoma Progression: Translation to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anna S Mursch-Edlmayr; Wai Siene Ng; Alberto Diniz-Filho; David C Sousa; Louis Arnold; Matthew B Schlenker; Karla Duenas-Angeles; Pearse A Keane; Jonathan G Crowston; Hari Jayaram
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.