Marc C Chamberlain1. 1. University of Washington, Department of Neurology & Neurological Surgery, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Avenue E, PO Box 19023, MS-G4940, Seattle, WA 98109-1023, USA. chambemc@uw.edu.
Abstract
AIM: Limited literature is available regarding the treatment of recurrent surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma, and it primarily examines the treatment of low-grade (WHO grade 1) meningioma. Data regarding systemic therapy for recurrent high-grade meningioma are sparse. A retrospective case series of patients with recurrent WHO grade 2/3 meningioma treated with IFN-α following progression after surgery, radiotherapy and hydroxyurea was carried out, with the primary study objective of overall response rate, and median and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS & METHODS: 35 patients (28 women and 17 men; median age 63 years; range: 36-86 years) with recurrent high-grade meningioma (WHO grade 2 [n = 22] or 3 [n = 13]) were treated with IFN-α (10 million units/m(2)) subcutaneously every 2 days; one cycle was operationally defined as 4 weeks of IFN-α. Patients had progressed radiographically after prior therapy with surgery (35 out of 35), radiotherapy (35 out of 35; external-beam radiotherapy: 35 out of 35; and stereotactic radiotherapy: 34 out of 35) and hydroxyurea chemotherapy (35 out of 35). One patient was also treated with a somatostatin analog before initiating IFN-α treatment. RESULTS: Patients received one to 13 cycles (median: three) of IFN-α with moderate toxicity (100% of patients manifested grades 1-3 toxicity, of which only 20% were grade 3). There were no radiographic responses, 63% of patients had stable disease and 37% manifested progressive disease at first evaluation. PFS was 17% at 6 months (95% CI: 0.07-0.31; median PFS: 12 weeks; 95% CI: 8-20 weeks; range: 4-52 weeks). Following progression on IFN-α, the majority of patients (60%) were subsequently treated on an alternative therapy. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective series, IFN-α was moderately toxic, but appeared to have limited activity in patients with recurrent high-grade meningiomas.
AIM: Limited literature is available regarding the treatment of recurrent surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma, and it primarily examines the treatment of low-grade (WHO grade 1) meningioma. Data regarding systemic therapy for recurrent high-grade meningioma are sparse. A retrospective case series of patients with recurrent WHO grade 2/3 meningioma treated with IFN-α following progression after surgery, radiotherapy and hydroxyurea was carried out, with the primary study objective of overall response rate, and median and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS & METHODS: 35 patients (28 women and 17 men; median age 63 years; range: 36-86 years) with recurrent high-grade meningioma (WHO grade 2 [n = 22] or 3 [n = 13]) were treated with IFN-α (10 million units/m(2)) subcutaneously every 2 days; one cycle was operationally defined as 4 weeks of IFN-α. Patients had progressed radiographically after prior therapy with surgery (35 out of 35), radiotherapy (35 out of 35; external-beam radiotherapy: 35 out of 35; and stereotactic radiotherapy: 34 out of 35) and hydroxyurea chemotherapy (35 out of 35). One patient was also treated with a somatostatin analog before initiating IFN-α treatment. RESULTS:Patients received one to 13 cycles (median: three) of IFN-α with moderate toxicity (100% of patients manifested grades 1-3 toxicity, of which only 20% were grade 3). There were no radiographic responses, 63% of patients had stable disease and 37% manifested progressive disease at first evaluation. PFS was 17% at 6 months (95% CI: 0.07-0.31; median PFS: 12 weeks; 95% CI: 8-20 weeks; range: 4-52 weeks). Following progression on IFN-α, the majority of patients (60%) were subsequently treated on an alternative therapy. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective series, IFN-α was moderately toxic, but appeared to have limited activity in patients with recurrent high-grade meningiomas.
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Winward Choy; Won Kim; Daniel Nagasawa; Stephanie Stramotas; Andrew Yew; Quinton Gopen; Andrew T Parsa; Isaac Yang Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Zofia von Marschall; Arne Scholz; Thorsten Cramer; Georgia Schäfer; Michael Schirner; Kjell Oberg; Bertram Wiedenmann; Michael Höcker; Stefan Rosewicz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; W K Alfred Yung; Kathleen R Lamborn; Andrew D Norden; Timothy F Cloughesy; Lauren E Abrey; Howard A Fine; Susan M Chang; H Ian Robins; Karen Fink; Lisa M Deangelis; Minesh Mehta; Emmanuelle Di Tomaso; Jan Drappatz; Santosh Kesari; Keith L Ligon; Ken Aldape; Rakesh K Jain; Charles D Stiles; Merrill J Egorin; Michael D Prados Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Suresh K Balasubramanian; Mayur Sharma; Danilo Silva; Vidhya Karivedu; Philipp Schmitt; Glen H Stevens; Gene H Barnett; Richard A Prayson; Paul Elson; John H Suh; Erin S Murphy; Samuel T Chao Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Robin A Buerki; Craig M Horbinski; Timothy Kruser; Peleg M Horowitz; Charles David James; Rimas V Lukas Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Maya Hrachova; Emely Nhi T Nguyen; Beverly D Fu; Manisha J Dandekar; Xiao-Tang Kong; Gilbert Cadena; Frank P K Hsu; John Billimek; Thomas H Taylor; Daniela A Bota Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Bhuvic Patel; Rupen Desai; Sangami Pugazenthi; Omar H Butt; Jiayi Huang; Albert H Kim Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 6.244