Literature DB >> 25054347

The effects of scapular mobilization in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Aydan Aytar1, Gul Baltaci, Tim L Uhl, Handan Tuzun, Pinar Oztop, Metin Karatas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of scapular mobilization on function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS).
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: University hospital clinics in Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: 66 participants (mean ± SD age 52.06 ± 3.71 y) with SAIS.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized into 3 groups: scapular mobilization, sham scapular mobilization, and supervised exercise. Before the interventions transcutaneous electrical stimulation and hot pack were applied to all groups. Total intervention duration for all groups was 3 wk with a total of 9 treatment sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Shoulder function and pain intensity were primary outcome measures; range of motion and participant satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Shoulder function was assessed with the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain severity. Active range of motion was measured with a universal goniometer. A 7-point Likert scale was used to evaluate satisfaction. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, before visits 5 and 10, 4 wk after visit 9, and 8 wk after visit 9.
RESULTS: There was no group difference for DASH score (P = .75), pain at rest (P = .41), pain with activity (P = .45), pain at night (P = .74), and shoulder flexion (P = .65), external rotation (P = .63), and internal rotation (P = .19). There was a significant increase in shoulder motion and function and a significant decrease in pain across time when all groups were combined (P < .001). The level of satisfaction was not significantly different for any of the questions about participant satisfaction between all groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: There was not a significant advantage of scapular mobilization for shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction compared with sham or supervised-exercise groups in patients with SAIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25054347     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  5 in total

1.  PARTIAL ARTICULAR SUPRASPINATUS TENDON AVULSION (PASTA) LESION. CURRENT CONCEPTS IN REHABILITATION.

Authors:  Guido Spargoli
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

2.  Dynamic scapular recognition exercise improves scapular upward rotation and shoulder pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Yih-Kuen Jan; Wadida H El Sayed; Mohamed E Abdel Wanis; Abeer A Yamany
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 3.  Screening of the cervical spine in subacromial shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Walker; Emma Salt; Greg Lynch; Chris Littlewood
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-20

4.  A systematic review of thrust manipulation combined with one conservative intervention for rotator cuff and related non-surgical shoulder conditions.

Authors:  Amy L Minkalis; Robert D Vining; Cynthia R Long; Cheryl Hawk; Katie de Luca
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-04

5.  Short-term Comparison of Supervised Rehabilitation and Home-based Rehabilitation for Earlier Recovery of Shoulder Motion, Pain, and Function after Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Si-Jung Song; Tae-Ho Jeong; Jung-Wha Moon; Han-Vit Park; Si Yung Lee; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.