Frederick Wang1, Peter F Koltz, Hani Sbitany. 1. San Francisco, Calif.; and Rochester, N.Y. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rochester.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was implemented to longitudinally track surgical 30-day surgical outcomes and complications. The authors analyze the program-reported outcomes for immediate breast reconstruction from 2007 to 2011, to assess whether longitudinal data collection has improved national outcomes and to highlight areas in need of continued improvement. METHODS: The authors reviewed the database from 2007 to 2011 and identified encounters for immediate breast reconstruction using Current Procedural Terminology codes for prosthetic and autologous reconstruction. Demographics and comorbidities were tabulated for all patients. Postoperative complications analyzed included surgical-site infection, wound dehiscence, implant or flap loss, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory infections. RESULTS: A total of 15,978 patients underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Fewer smokers underwent immediate reconstruction over time (p=0.126), whereas more obese patients (p=0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4 patients (p<0.001) underwent surgery. An overall increase in superficial surgical-site infection was noted, from 1.7 percent to 2.3 percent (p=0.214). Wound dehiscence (p=0.036) increased over time, whereas implant loss (p=0.015) and flap loss (p=0.012) decreased over time. Mean operative times increased over the analyzed years, as did all complications for prosthetic and autologous reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set has shown an increase in complications for immediate breast reconstruction over time, because of a longitudinally higher number of comorbid patients and longer operative times. This knowledge allows plastic surgeons the unique opportunity to improve patient selection criteria and efficiency. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was implemented to longitudinally track surgical 30-day surgical outcomes and complications. The authors analyze the program-reported outcomes for immediate breast reconstruction from 2007 to 2011, to assess whether longitudinal data collection has improved national outcomes and to highlight areas in need of continued improvement. METHODS: The authors reviewed the database from 2007 to 2011 and identified encounters for immediate breast reconstruction using Current Procedural Terminology codes for prosthetic and autologous reconstruction. Demographics and comorbidities were tabulated for all patients. Postoperative complications analyzed included surgical-site infection, wound dehiscence, implant or flap loss, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory infections. RESULTS: A total of 15,978 patients underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Fewer smokers underwent immediate reconstruction over time (p=0.126), whereas more obesepatients (p=0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4 patients (p<0.001) underwent surgery. An overall increase in superficial surgical-site infection was noted, from 1.7 percent to 2.3 percent (p=0.214). Wound dehiscence (p=0.036) increased over time, whereas implant loss (p=0.015) and flap loss (p=0.012) decreased over time. Mean operative times increased over the analyzed years, as did all complications for prosthetic and autologous reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set has shown an increase in complications for immediate breast reconstruction over time, because of a longitudinally higher number of comorbid patients and longer operative times. This knowledge allows plastic surgeons the unique opportunity to improve patient selection criteria and efficiency. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Authors: Stana Pačarić; Želimir Orkić; Marko Babić; Nikolina Farčić; Andrea Milostić-Srb; Robert Lovrić; Ivana Barać; Štefica Mikšić; Jasenka Vujanić; Tajana Turk; Zvjezdana Gvozdanović; Dragica Pavlović; Nika Srb; Ivana Pačarić Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani; Erin Cordeiro; Anne C O'Neill; Stefan O P Hofer; Tulin D Cil; Toni Zhong Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 1.763